This also lets me query the relative numbers of resources with different licences:
Licence Resources
*No copyright restrictions (Public Domain/ CC-Zero)* 1
*GPL / LGPL / MIT / Other free software licence* 1
*Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY)* 19
*Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA)* 10
*Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC-BY-NC)* 28
*Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike (CC-BY-NC-SA)* 43
*Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND)* 13
*Mix of licences* 3
*Full copyright with permission for educational use* 11
*Standard YouTube Licence* 37
*All Rights Reserved* 202
*Not known: assume All Rights Reserved* 184
Notes:1) We have dozens more CC-By-NC materials not yet catalogued into this database.
2) CC-By-NC-SA is the MIT OCW licence, which explains why there is so much in that category
3) "Full copyright with permission for educational use" is a pseudo-licence, clearly, but there are still academics using this sort of wording.
Hope this is interesting to somebody. Recent discussions on this list have
only made me more keen to prioritise free cultural works.
--
Dr Martin L Poulter
ICT Manager, The Economics Network