A thought worth sharing

 

 

 

http://www.health4work.nhs.uk/blog/2013/06/gp-fit-note-decisions-need-not-always-be-the-definitive-last-word/

 

GP fit note decisions need not always be the definitive last word

Posted on by renieshaw

A change included in new guidance on the fit note published by the Government in March 2013 (see our blog on the revised fit note guidance for more information) could allow employers to favour the views of an occupational health practitioner over those of a GP. In the guidance (under the headline ‘Is the fit note binding on me?’) the Government has confirmed that the answer could be ‘no’. The relevant section from the fit note guidance reads as follows:

“No. The assessment about whether your employee is not fit for work or may be fit for work (and any other advice in the fit note) is classed as advice, and it is for employers to determine whether or not to accept it. Occasionally, you may be believe that your employee is not fit for work when they have been assessed as fit for work by their doctor, or you may think that your employee could do some work when they have been assessed as ‘not fit for work’ by their doctor.

 “In situations like this you are within your rights to gather other evidence about your employee’s fitness for work from other doctors or healthcare professionals. You can choose to give this other evidence precedence over the advice in the fit note. Your employee may disagree with you, and you may need to demonstrate to an employment tribunal why the alternative source of evidence was more acceptable to you than the fit note.”

This change was intended to cover situations in which, based on the knowledge of a workplace and the work an employee does, an employer/occupational health professional may have a different view to a GP on the person’s ability to work. For example, an employer may consider that a person isn’t fit to return to work based on the nature of the workplace, despite having been judged by the GP to be ready to return. Or, alternatively, an employer may be of the view that an employee who has been assessed as not fit for work could return to carry out alternative work functions instead.

This change is good news from the perspective of occupational health practitioners who are often better placed than GPs to decide whether or not a person is fit enough to return to the workplace, and which particular roles the person could carry out. However, GPs will be keen to ensure that they make the best judgement call, where possible.

 

 

 

 


The information in this email and in any attachment(s) is commercial in confidence.

If you are not the named addressee(s) or if you receive this email in error then any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.

Please return it to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you.

Whilst e-mail and attachments are virus checked Gloucestershire Healthcare Community does not accept any liability in respect of any virus which is not detected.

Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of their respective organisation.

2gether NHS Foundation Trust : http://www.2gether.nhs.uk
Gloucestershire Care Services NHS Trust : http://www.glos-care.nhs.uk
Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group : http://www.gloucestershireccg.nhs.uk

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust : http://www.gloshospitals.org.uk

 

******************************** Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH