I totally agree. Folk regularly – almost on a weekly basis – endorse me for my library cataloguing skills. It’s true, I’ve been cataloguing for decades, and I do have these skills. However, in the past decade I’ve built up my research profile significantly. It’s frustrating when people who don’t really know me – or how I spend my week (currently 60% librarianship, 40% research), endorse me for a routine activity which is most assuredly not my highest level skill! I haven’t yet worked out how to adjust my profile to indicate which skills I most want people to rate highly!
Karen
Karen McAulay
Music and Academic Services Librarian
+44 (0)141 270 8267 (direct)
From: UKEIG: the UK eInformation Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob Bater
Sent: 02 July 2013 23:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: LinkedIn endorsements
Wendy et al.,
I am somewhat relieved to hear someone
express doubts about the way LinkedIn endorsements work. I was not aware of the particular problems Wendy describes, and I thank her for making me aware of them. My doubts however, are much more fundamental.
I have received numerous endorsements from colleagues I know personally and who know what skills and experience I have, for which I am grateful. However, I have also received endorsements from people who, whilst indeed being LinkedIn Contacts, I have neither met nor worked with. They would appear to have endorsed me on the basis perhaps of having read my Profile, or possibly through reputation from contacts held in common, though I doubt the latter. Either way, such endorsements are based on 'hearsay', not on any direct personal knowledge of my competences. I suspect these endorsements occur simply because LinkedIn prompts us to endorse a random selection of our Contacts and we don't really think it through. So much can hang on a single
click.
In my view, this considerably reduces the value of the endorsement system for those at whom (I assume) it is aimed. Presumably, the system is designed to allow third parties requiring people with particular skills to be able to search for them. But if many of the returned results are based upon mere 'hearsay', then is that really so helpful?
And yes, I understand that some might comment that Google searches are based on comparable 'hearsay' criteria, and we seem to be OK with that. Well, while I would hate to contemplate tackling the Web without a tool like Google, that doesn't mean I think it does the best possible job. Google's relevance algorithms do what they do very satisfactorily for the public at large. However, if I were a businessperson needing to make a vital decision based upon precise criteria, then I would approach a Google result set with caution. I suggest that we would be wise to do the same with result sets in
LinkedIn derived from Endorsement data.
Rant over!
Regards,
Bob
--------------
Bob Bater
KnowPlexity Ltd.
On 02/07/2013 22:36, Wendy Warr wrote:
Colleagues,
I expect
that most of you have been bombarded with emails about endorsements on LinkedIn but I wonder how many of you know about the duplicate endorsement bug. I am only allowed 50 skills. I am already over the limit. If someone endorses me for Computational Chemistry and another person endorses me for computational chemistry, I end up endorsed for two separate skills. If someone endorses me for patricide or the Tour de France, those skills go on record too. The end product is not fit for purpose. I might then be modest enough to want to delete my unlikely cycling skills but I am not allowed to do so (because of a bug) until I resolve my many duplicate skills. Unfortunately you cannot merge duplicated skills and if you delete a skill you lose all the endorsements and you are supposed to contact all your friends and ask them to re-endorse you!
Be warned! This whole thing has got out of hand. My thanks, though, to the many people who have endorsed me. Keep up the good work. Maybe the huge number of complaints will encourage LinkedIn to do a fix.
Wendy
Dr. Wendy A. Warr
Wendy
Warr & Associates
6 Berwick Court, Holmes Chapel
Cheshire, CW4 7HZ, England
Tel./Fax +44 (0)1477 533837
Skype: wendyannewarr
Twitter: @WendyAnneWarr
This e-mail and any attachments is intended for the above named only, and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the e-mail is prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
While Royal Conservatoire of Scotland checks emails for known viruses, please note that neither Royal Conservatoire of Scotland nor the sender accepts any liability for viruses or other defects and it is your responsibility to scan any attachments included with this e-mail.
Royal Conservatoire of Scotland is a company limited by guarantee Reg. No.4703 (Scotland) and a charity registered in Scotland, No: SCO15855
