 |
 |
I totally agree with Laurence Charles Professor Charles Oppenheim ________________________________ From: "Bebbington, Laurence W" <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013, 10:12 Subject: Re: Rebranding As a CILIP member (for now anyway) I support Tom Roper’s view that he should be given equal access to put his case. When I saw the Newsletter presenting a one-sided view I think it was shameful, unprofessional and procedurally suspect. Tom should be given the same space to put his case, and it should be distributed directly in the same way. Anything else is disgraceful. Laurence Laurence W. Bebbington Deputy Librarian and Head of Library Services Library, Special Collections & Museums The Sir Duncan Rice Library The University of Aberdeen Bedford Road Aberdeen AB24 3AA Email: [log in to unmask] Tel: 01224 272596 Web: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/library/ From:Library and Information Professionals [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kevin Symonds Sent: 28 June 2013 10:08 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Rebranding Going by the survey it looks like we should just go back to The Library Association. Everyone knows what it is and what it means and represents! Kevin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Symonds Library and Information Services Manager Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit 15 Chaucer Road Cambridge CB2 7EF http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From:Library and Information Professionals [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Roper Sent: 28 June 2013 09:58 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Rebranding I'm grateful to CILIP for making the results of the rebranding survey public, and they may be seen at http://www.cilip.org.uk/about-us/brand/Documents/CILIP_Consultation_June%202013_25%20(4).pdf I'll save a detailed critique for the General Meeting on 8 July, but I have to say that it's hard to see why it's worth £35,000. I asked two days ago that CILIP, having sent an e-mail to all (or most, the system doesn't seem to reach everyone) members calling on them to defeat the motion to allow me equal access to put the case for the motion. So far, silence. Can I urge everyone to either attend the General Meeting, or to register a proxy vote? The proxy form is at http://fs3.formsite.com/cilip/proxy/index.html and the registration form at http://fs3.formsite.com/cilip/form198/index.html Tom Tom Roper [log in to unmask] Twitter: @tomroper http://www.roper.org.uk The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.