USArray involves, of course, a set of BB stations that are progressively leap-frogged over one another. They are not all permanent. This would need real co-operation in Europe.

Gillian

On 18 Jun 2013, at 7:55, Sheila Peacock wrote:

Dear All,

I should be grateful for any geophysics suggestions
for big science that could be passed on to the House
of Lords consultation.  My own thoughts include:

1. a EuroArray seismic array equivalent to the USArray, or better
still, a EuroRussianArray;

2. An ability to do 3-D marine and land seismic acquisition,
processing and visualisation for research purposes.

I'm a seismologist, as you see, so I need input from specialists
in other areas of geophysics.  I'll pass any suggestions
on to Robert Massey (Royal Astronomical Soc.) for
inclusion in the response.

Regards,
Sheila Peacock,
RAS Council member.



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Lords inquiry into Scientific Infrastructure
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:57:38 +0100
From: Robert Massey <[log in to unmask]>
To: Andrew Norton <[log in to unmask]>, Barry Parsons <[log in to unmask]>, Charles Barclay <[log in to unmask]>, David Southwood <[log in to unmask]>, Don Kurtz <[log in to unmask]>, Geraint Jones <[log in to unmask]>, Gillian Foulger <[log in to unmask]>, Helen Fraser <[log in to unmask]>, Ian Crawford <[log in to unmask]>, John Brown <[log in to unmask]>, Lyndsay Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>, Mandy Bailey <[log in to unmask]>, Martin Barstow <[log in to unmask]>, Mike Cruise <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Murdin <[log in to unmask]>, Peter Coles <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Davis <[log in to unmask]>, Sarah Matthews <[log in to unmask]>, Sheila Peacock <[log in to unmask]>, Simon Mitton <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Miller <[log in to unmask]>, Yvonne Elsworth <[log in to unmask]>



Dear All

You may remember that I sent round a note about this and the two other consultations (on Scottish independence and on the EU) a couple of weeks ago. See http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/science-technology/ScientificInfrastructure/CfEScientificInfrastructure.pdf

There are some fairly general questions in the inquiry that are best suited to a joint response (in our case through the Science Council – I contributed to a round table discussion they organised last week) but it nonetheless seems appropriate to respond to some points in our own right. In particular, I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on the following question:

“What substantial increases in scale would allow new areas or domains of science to be explored (analogous to Large Hadron Collider and Higgs boson)?”

Would you mind sending suggestions through to allow me to collate them? The deadline for the inquiry is this Friday, so I’d need to see these by tomorrow to stand a reasonable chance of assembling a response.

Many thanks and best wishes

Robert

Dr Robert Massey

Deputy Executive Secretary

Royal Astronomical Society

www.ras.org.uk <http://www.ras.org.uk>

Tel: +44 (0)20 7734 3307 / 4582 x214

Mob: +44 (0)794 124 8035


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prof. G. R. Foulger,

Durham University,

Dept. Earth Sciences (Room 319), Science Labs, South Rd., 

Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K.


Editor, Earth-Science Reviews


tel: (0191) 334 2314 or (0191) 386 4533

fax: (0191) 334 2301

email: [log in to unmask]

http://www.dur.ac.uk/g.r.foulger


Do plumes exist? Please visit: http://www.mantleplumes.org/


Plates vs Plumes: A Geological Controversy 
by Gillian R. Foulger
ISBN: 978-1-4051-6148-0, 352 pages,
2010, Wiley-Blackwell
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------