 |
 |
I reloaded a search (not saved so recovered to be accurate) today which I did on Monday..only 4 lines but all duplicated ..makes a complete nonsense of the numbering of combined lines *Gill Kaye* ** Assistant Librarian Illingworth Library Sheffield Children's Hospital Western Bank Sheffield S10 2TH Tel No: 0114 27 17347 Direct email: [log in to unmask] General enquiries: [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask] Website: www.illingworthlibrary.nhs.uk Library Catalogue:http://illingworth.cirqahosting.com Please connect with us: * <http://illingworthlibrary.blogspot.com/> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Illingworth-Library-Sheffield-Childrens-NHS-Foundation-Trust/187116974708311> <https://twitter.com/#!/IllingworthInfo> <http://delicious.com/illingworthinfo> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/illingworth-library/43/aa1/83b>* On 30 April 2013 10:24, Sutton Sarah - Clinical Librarian < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Apologies for cross posting**** > > ** ** > > I have been doing some research with a doctor and when we reviewed the > search history that HDAS had saved with my selected results, it didn’t > match my actual typed in search strategy. The results looked OK but the > strategy reads oddly. I then reloaded my saved search, which again had > repeated lines and incorrect ands and ors, so I did the correct ands and > ors and it came up with the same results as I had saved last time, but the > search history with my saved results doesn’t match the actual Boolean > statements I used , and I have a screen dump of my working screen to prove > this.**** > > ** ** > > As I now have to explain all this to my poor doctor colleague (ie why does > the recorded search strategy look insane) it would be handy to have other > examples to tell him about of the same thing. This was a search I ran in > February and we have just examined the strategy in detail. So it may be an > old fault still saved with the search from that time. **** > > ** ** > > Don’t you just love HDAS…..**** > > ** ** > > I will of course then pass on this bundle of joy to HDAS, but thought more > evidence would help.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Best wishes**** > > Sarah**** > > Sarah Sutton**** > > Clinical Librarian**** > > Cancer and Haematology, Children's Services, Diabetes Care, Emergency > Department, Renal Services and Urology, Women's, Perinatal and Sexual > Health Services.**** > > [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE2153.955968F0]**** > > LRI Library, Clinical Education Centre > 2nd Floor > ****Jarvis** **Building**** > **Leicester** Royal Infirmary > Infirmary Square > **Leicester** > LE1 5WW**** > > Tel 0116 258 5558**** > > [log in to unmask]**** > > www.uhl-library.nhs.uk**** > > http://clinicallibrarian.blogspot.com/**** > > **** > > ** ** > > **** > > ** ** > > ------------------------------ > This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and / > or privileged information and is intended for the exclusive use of the > addressee(s) printed above. If you are not the addressee(s), any > unauthorised review, disclosure, reproduction, other dissemination or use > of this e-mail, or taking of any action in reliance upon the information > contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If this e-mail has been sent to > you in error, please return to the sender. No guarantee can be given that > the contents of this email are virus free - The University Hospitals of > Leicester NHS Trust cannot be held responsible for any failure by the > recipient(s) to test for viruses before opening any attachments. The > information contained in this e-mail may be the subject of public > disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 - unless legally > exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this e-mail and your reply > cannot be guaranteed. Copyright in this email and any attachments created > by us remains vested in the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust. >