On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Leigh Blackmore
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Cheers Mogg
I appreciate your point of view but why do you find my response 'legalistic'? I have queried Elaine's attitude as objectionable to myself, and also offered some opinions from my reading of Hymenaeus Beta's essay on this matter. This is simply a contribution to a matter which others have raised.
While not everyone (and I include myself in this) agree with everything the so-called Caliphate OTO does, I thinmk mutual courtesy on this list is called for, and the tone of some of the posts addressing these matters which are important to Thelemites is (at least potentially) offensive.
Love is the law, love under Will
Leigh Blackmore
On 14/05/2013 7:48 PM, mandrake wrote:
Dear Leigh
I suspect all the contributors to the debate are in the same boat - ie view Liber AL as a religious text close to their heart -
but it is the nature of theological debate for people to say the sort of things they do - even criticise co-religionists for alleged
mendacity etc . I doubt people would say it if they didn't care . . .
It might help a bit of free and fair debate to avoid getting too legalistic about things - just a thought : )
"Love and do what you will"
Mogg Morgan