 |
 |
I foresee the value of this list going into sharp decline for the next couple of weeks... On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Leigh Blackmore <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Cheers Mogg > > I appreciate your point of view but why do you find my response > 'legalistic'? I have queried Elaine's attitude as objectionable to myself, > and also offered some opinions from my reading of Hymenaeus Beta's essay on > this matter. This is simply a contribution to a matter which others have > raised. > > While not everyone (and I include myself in this) agree with everything > the so-called Caliphate OTO does, I thinmk mutual courtesy on this list is > called for, and the tone of some of the posts addressing these matters > which are important to Thelemites is (at least potentially) offensive. > > Love is the law, love under Will > Leigh Blackmore > > > > On 14/05/2013 7:48 PM, mandrake wrote: > >> Dear Leigh >> >> I suspect all the contributors to the debate are in the same boat - ie >> view Liber AL as a religious text close to their heart - >> but it is the nature of theological debate for people to say the sort of >> things they do - even criticise co-religionists for alleged >> mendacity etc . I doubt people would say it if they didn't care . . . >> >> It might help a bit of free and fair debate to avoid getting too >> legalistic about things - just a thought : ) >> >> "Love and do what you will" >> >> >> Mogg Morgan >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> > > -- > Leigh Blackmore > Proof Perfect Editorial Services > [log in to unmask]**com.au<[log in to unmask]> > www.proofperfect.com.au > http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=CrxjWZUqS6o<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrxjWZUqS6o> >