Dear Matthew, this seems to have worked but you managed to confuse me a little more with regards to the F-test. Sorry. :-) You say ("e.g. -F 2.3"). I thought that if I only specified one F-test in my design and checked the three boxes, this would be a combined F-test. If what you are writing is correct in my case, then should I write -F 1.2.3 in order to get the full F? Sorry, I don't understand the "2.3".... Another quick question: Can I combine the F-test with the --T2 option or are these exclusive? I am not sure I quite understand whether these two options can be run together in one analysis or whether they should be run separately. Thanks so much for your help, sven ___________ Hello Sven, It looks like you are using a lower case ( -f ) for the F-test cluster threshold option, this should be a capital F ( e.g. -F 2.3 ) - can you try this and let us know if the error changes? Kind Regards Matthew > Dear FSLers, > > I am new to FSL and am currently analysing 4 groups DTI TBSS data and have > worked my way through the tutorial and posts on the mailing list. However, > I am still confused with the F-Test. > > If I include the -f design.fts option but not specify an -F [number] > option, I get an error message that no specific option was selected but if > I do say -F 1 then I get another error message. So concretely, I had used > the example on the TBSS stats webpage: > > randomise -i all_FA_skeletonised -o tbss -m mean_FA_skeleton_mask -d > model_test1.mat -t model_test1.con -f model_test1.fts -n 5000 -c 2 -V > > Message: > Loading Data: > Data loaded > 1.16979e+44 permutations required for exhaustive test of f-test 1 > Doing 5000 random permutations > Warning! No output options selected. Outputing raw tstat only > > I had then tried > > randomise options: -i all_FA_skeletonised -o tbss -m mean_FA_skeleton_mask > -d model_test1.mat -t model_test1.con -f model_test1.fts -n 5000 -c 2 -f 1 > -V > > but got > Loading Data: ERROR: Program failed > > An exception has been thrown > Unable to open 1 > > Exiting > > _______ > > If my design matrix is such that > F-TEST > 1 -1 0 0 check > 1 0 -1 0 check > 1 0 0 -1 check > …… > …… set of remaining t-contrasts here without selection of F, e.g., > 0 0 1 -1 not checked > … etc > > What option should I use in randomize to get the output for my F-test? > Should I use a combination of these to specify the contrast or can I > ignore the error and check this once the statistics have run? > > > Many thanks in advance for any suggestions! > > Sven >