 |
 |
Ken wrote: "Rewriting Levin and Redell creates misunderstanding through subtle shifts of meaning. The metaphrase also introduced errors in grammar and language that were correct in the original. The original is better." Sorry to hear that my play with words creates misunderstanding. But I did try to make shifts in meaning: and I hoped that they would be meaningful shifts in meaning. Perhaps I should take it down. I mean, if it doesn't contribute with anything compared to the original I guess I should. Out of respect to a very good and useful original paper. Not surprised that it introduced errors. Probably because I'm not a native English. // Mattias -- Mattias Arvola, PhD, Docent (Reader) in Cognitive Science. Director of Studies for the Undergraduate Programme in Cognitive Science. Sr. Lecturer in Interaction Design. Linköping University. www.arvola.se ----------------------------------------------------------------- PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design -----------------------------------------------------------------