Print

Print


I should add that I'm speaking from the general standpoint of how the GLM
works (so for a FEAT GLM, R GLM, SPSS GLM).  Randomise with the -D option
is different as it implicitly adds the column of 1s.

Cheers,
Jeanette

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jeanette Mumford <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Yes, there's a huge difference, one model has 2EVs and the other has 1.
>  This will always indicate models are not equivalent.  This is also a
> different problem than what you asked originally as I thought you had a
> group covariate as well.  Your second model would need a column of 1s to be
> equivalent to the first.
>
> Without the column of 1's you're assuming your two group's means are
> perfectly centered about 0.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeanette
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Vincent Koppelmans <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeanette,
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> So is there any difference in the outcomes of the following two designs?
>>
>> A)
>> Group A = 0 1
>> Group B = 1 0
>>
>> Design.mat
>> 0 1
>> 0 1
>> 0 1
>> 1 0
>> 1 0
>> 1 0
>>
>> Design.con
>> 1 -1
>> -1 1
>>
>>
>> B)
>> Group A = -1
>> Group B = 1
>>
>> Design.mat
>> -1
>> -1
>> -1
>> 1
>> 1
>> 1
>>
>> Design.con
>> 1
>> -1
>>
>> Thanks, Vincent
>>
>>
>> Op 18 mrt. 2013, om 12:01 heeft Jeanette Mumford <
>> [log in to unmask]> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You're on the right track. Add a covariate that is 1 for left and -1 for
>> right.  Assuming Ev1=group1 EV2=group2 and EV3=handedness, the
>> [ 0 0 1] contrast will test for when left>right
>> [0 0 -1] contrast will test for when right<left
>>
>> No collinearity will occur if you limit yourself to these 3EVs and you
>> can get at all inferences of interest.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeanette
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Vincent <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear FSL experts,
>>>
>>> When you create a design matrix using for example "design_ttest2 design
>>> 7 11" you will get a 2 by 18 matrix. The two columns both represent group
>>> membership, which are both needed in order to find out where group1 >
>>> group2 and where group2 > group1.
>>>
>>> However, when I enter a dichotomous covariate of no interest (e.g.
>>> handedness), I do not need to create two columns. Creating one column would
>>> be sufficient to model out the effect of handedness. Is that correct?
>>>
>>> If I would be interested for which voxels left > right, and when right >
>>> left, then I should create two columns, just like the group variable
>>> created by design_ttest2 (and change the the design.con file accordingly).
>>> Right?
>>>
>>> Now if I consider the last scenario, where there are two columns for
>>> handedness, but that are entered as covariates of no interest,  would that
>>> result in multicolinearity? How does randomise handles this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Vincent
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>