Print

Print


One minor correction, fixed effects FEAT also uses weighted OLS.

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:45 AM, MCLAREN, Donald
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The combined weights are whatever you tell the program. If you use 1s
> and -1s, then your estimate will be N times as great as 1 run. I'd
> recommend using 1/N and -1/N. This will create the average contrast
> across runs. You could also decide to weight each run based on the
> number of trials.
>
> In FSL, the weighting is based on the variance - not the beta. It will
> deweight betas with high variance estimates. It's only used with FLAME
> and other models, not the OLS model.
>
> Best Regards, Donald McLaren
> =================
> D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
> Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and
> Harvard Medical School
> Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA
> Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren
> Office: (773) 406-2464
> =====================
> This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED
> HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
> reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
> unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773)
> 406-2464 or email.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Glen Lee <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Dear SPM experts,
>>
>> For the 1st level GLM, I've been modeling each run separately as opposed to
>> concatenating all the runs.
>> Obviously I get more beta values that are generated by each run. However,
>> when I create the contrast images (condition A vs. condition B), I then
>> combine betas corresponding to the same condition across the entire runs.
>>
>> I've been assuming that this fixed analysis would be just as simple as an
>> independent t-test for comparing betas in two different conditions without
>> any other complicate procedures such as giving a greater weight to the
>> higher beta value (I heard that this is the way how FSL does).
>>
>> If anybody knows how this works out, please help me.
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>> Glen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>