thanks a lot. Seems to work. I have a question regarding -R option of fslstats. Does it report the range of significance in the following way?:
fslstats tbss_tfce_p_tstat2 -R
0.000000 0.998000
If that is the case when I run:
tbss_fill tbss_tfce_corrp_tstat2 0.95 mean_FA tbss_fill
fslview mean_FA -b 0,0.6 mean_FA_skeleton -l Green -b 0.2,0.7 tbss_fill -l Red-Yellow
Should I see enlarged significant clusters? because i dont
thanks a lot for your help I do appreciate it
cheers
sandra
2013/2/10 Jeanette Mumford
<[log in to unmask]>
Hi,
I think that looks fine. With fsl 5 you don't need to mean center behav in a single subject model with the -D option. Don't use it with this model.
Cheers,
Jeanette
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Sandra Petris
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
ps: with fsl 5 i dont need to demean the behav score right? I forgot it bu i can leave like that anyway?2013/2/8 Sandra Petris
<[log in to unmask]>
Dear fsl experts,
I want to compare 2 groups of 6 subjects each with respect to the correlation between FA values and behavioral scores.
Please check if the following design matrix and constarst file are correct
/NumWaves 2
/NumPoints 12
/PPheights 1 1
/Matrix
1 0.029
1 1.1071
1 1.4751
1 1.5159
1 1.7623
1 2.05
0 2.8715
0 3.031
0 3.1102
0 3.5682
0 3.7093
0 4.1891
/NumWaves 2
/NumContrasts 2
/PPheights 1 1
/Matrix
1 -1
-1 1
Should I demean the data adding the -D option in the randomose script?
Any advice would greately appreaciated
Cheers,
sandra