 |
 |
Ah, you guys are so great. Thanks for all these references I probably never would have found! Cheers, Angela Angela Perri Department of Archaeology Durham University Durham, UK On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Nerissa Russell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > See also: > > Darwent, Christyann M., and R. Lee Lyman > 2002 Detecting the post-burial fragmentation of carpals, tarsals, and > phalanges. In Advances in Forensic Taphonomy. W. D. Haglund and M. H. > Sorg, eds. Pp. 355-377. Boca Raton: CRC Press. > > Horwitz, Liora R. K. > 1990 The origin of partially digested bones recovered from > archaeological > contexts in Israel. Paléorient 16(1):97-106. > > Jourdan, Lucien, and Jean-François Le Mouel > 1987 Découpe de phoque: Partage entre l'Homme et l'Animal. In La Découpe > et le Partage du Corps à travers le Temps et L'Espace. J.-D. Vigne, ed. > Pp. 31-38. Anthropozoologica. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la > Recherche Scientifique. > > Munson, Patrick J., and Rexford C. Garniewicz > 2003 Age-mediated survivorship of ungulate mandibles and teeth in > canid-ravaged faunal assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science > 30(4):405-416. > > Solomon, Su, and Bruno David > 1990 Middle range theory and actualistic studies: Bones and dingoes in > Australian archaeology. In Problem Solving in Taphonomy: Archaeological > and Palaeontological Studies from Europe, Africa and Oceania. S. Solomon, > I. Davidson, and D. Watson, eds. Pp. 233-255. Tempus. St. Lucia: > University of Queensland Anthropology Museum. > > > > > > > And for wolf: > Barja, Isabel, and Eduardo Corona M. > 2007 El análisis de excretas desde la etología y la arqueozoología: El > caso del lobo ibérico. In Human and Faunal Relationships Reviewed: An > Archaeozoological Approach. E. Corona M. and J. Arroyo-Cabrales, eds. Pp. > 113-121. British Archaeological Reports, International Series. Oxford: > Archaeopress. > > > Esteban Nadal, Montserrat > 2012 Can Archaeozoology and Taphonomy contribute to knowledge of the > feeding habits of the Iberian wolf? Journal of Archaeological Science > 39(10):3208-3216. > > Esteban Nadal, Montserrat, Isabel Cáceres, and Philippe Fosse > 2010 Characterization of a current coprogenic sample originated by Canis > lupus as a tool for identifying a taphonomic agent. Journal of > Archaeological Science 37(12):2959-2970. > > > And coyote: > > Rensberger, John M., and Hartmut B. Krentz > 1988 Microscopic effects of predator digestion on the surfaces of bones > and teeth. Scanning Microscopy 2:1541-1551. > > Schmitt, Dave N., and Kenneth E. Juell > 1994 Toward the identification of coyote scatological faunal > accumulations > in archaeological contexts. Journal of Archaeological Science > 21(2):249-262. > > > Schmitt, Dave N., and Karen D. Lupo > 1995 On mammalian taphonomy, taxonomic diversity, and measuring > subsistence data in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity 60(3):496-514. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nerissa Russell > Associate Professor and Chair > Department of Anthropology > Cornell University > Ithaca, NY 14853 > USA > 607-255-6790 > > > > > > > On 1/16/13 10:34 AM, "Madrigal, Cregg" <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > >Angela, > > > >Morey and Klippel covers experiments with both wolf and dog: > >Morey, D. F., and W. E. Klippel > >1991 Canid Scavenging and Deer Bone Survivorship at an Archaic Period > >Site in Tennessee. Archaeozoologia 4(1):11-28. > > > >Klippel et al. deals with wolves (and owls), not dogs, but specifically > >addresses digested bone: > > > >Klippel, Walter E., Snyder, Lynn M., & Paul W. Parmalee > >1987 Taphonomy and archaeologically recovered mammal bone from southeast > >Missouri. Journal of Ethnobiology 7(2):155-169. > > > >Both are excellent articles. The 1987 one is available for free here: > > > http://ethnobiology.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/JoE/7-2/Klippeletal1987.p > >df > > > >There is also: > >Kent, Susan > >1981 The dog: an archaeologist's best friend or worst enemy-the spatial > >distribution of faunal remains. Journal of Field Archaeology 8:367-372. > > > >Good luck, > > > >Cregg Madrigal > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >________________________________ > >From: Analysis of animal remains from archaeological sites > >[[log in to unmask]] on behalf of angela perri [[log in to unmask] > ] > >Sent: 16 January 2013 11:44 > >To: [log in to unmask] > >Subject: [ZOOARCH] Digested bone from dogs > > > >Dear ZOOARCHers, > > > >I am on the hunt for additional references for the analysis, > >experimentation, etc. of digested animal bone (any animal) from domestic > >dogs. I have the references below, but I am wondering if anyone knows of > >any additional papers specifically related to domestic dogs? > > > > > >Payne & Munson 1985, Jones 1986, Butler 1990, Butler & Schroeder 1998 > > > > > >Cheers, > >Angela > > > > > >Angela Perri > >Department of Archaeology > >Durham University > >Durham, UK >