Follow up to previously forwarded note about presentation of government statistics.
 
See also Declan Gaffney's article at http://lartsocial.org/IBNov12
 
John.
 
------------------------------------------------------------
From Professor John Veit-Wilson
Newcastle University GPS -- Sociology
Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England.
Telephone: +44[0]191-222 7498
email [log in to unmask]
www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/j.veit-wilson/
 
 


From: Social-Policy is run by SPA for all social policy specialists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adrian Sinfield
Sent: 31 January 2013 15:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: DWP statistics response to my note on press release

I sent my note 'Nearly one in three people on incapacity benefits capable of work' DWP - and 'alienating welfare reform' Salmond' to the DWP statisticians yesterday evening and I received this reply before lunch today. Adrian

Your query regarding the wording of the DWP Press Release has been passed to myself and, after reviewing the issues you have raised and the press release, I would like to clarify my understanding of your comment.

You have correctly pointed out that the statistic relates only to those receiving incapacity benefits, however, when I reviewed the headline of the press release and the statement from the article to which you provided the link, both included the word incapacity and neither suggested it was all benefit claimants.

When referring to "Incapacity Benefits", DWP is referring only Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance. (This is common across all of our products, please see the following link to the regular Statistical Summary http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/stats_summary/stats_summary_aug12.pdf). I do concede in this case however, that it could be unclear as to whether this included Employment and Support Allowance and will look to resolve this in future publications and releases.

I can understand your point of view on the figures only covering those who have been assessed to date, however, on considering the production process of the statistics and overall wording of the release, do not feel it to be misleading. There is no systematic order in which the order of assessments have been selected and therefore those who have been through the process can be viewed as a random sample of the overall group receiving incapacity benefits. The figures will fluctuate slightly once claims still in progress and outcomes of appeals have been included, however, it is unlikely that they would change greatly. Therefore, its use in the headline of the release is not inappropriate.

If I have misunderstood your comment please let me know.

Regards

Gemma Stewart
Statistician | Department for Work and Pensions | Professional Services | Information, Governance and Security (IGS) Directorate | BP5201 | Benton Park View | Benton Park Road | Longbenton | Newcastle upon Tyne | NE98 1YX | 0191 216 2098 | 45098 | www.dwp.gov.uk | Please consider the environment before printing

****************************************************** Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your message will go only to the sender of this message. If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically to [log in to unmask] Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk. *******************************************************