 |
 |
Oh that has made me shake! Dear oh dear ... Nicky Grace Senior Research Midwife andIndependent Midwife NHS email address: [log in to unmask] Mobile number: 07771906787 Gracewife and WiseBirthing are trading names of Grace Midwifery Limited, Registered with Companies House, Co No: 6205898 Nicola Grace is a Registered Midwife, registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council PIN No: 97B0285E http://www.nmc-uk.org/ Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:19:06 +0000 From: [log in to unmask] Subject: FW: paper in AJOG journal says midwives and other professionals have a professional obligation not to attend or research planned home births To: [log in to unmask] I thought some of you on the lists might find this paper interesting – and that you may want to respond to AJOG…???!!: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 11. Planned home birth: the professional responsibility response. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Brent RL, Levene MI, Arabin B. Source Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY. Abstract This article addresses the recrudescence of and new support for midwife-supervised planned home birth in the United States and the other developed countries in the context of professional responsibility. Advocates of planned home birth have emphasized patient safety, patient satisfaction, cost effectiveness, and respect for women's rights. We provide a critical evaluation of each of these claims and identify professionally appropriate responses of obstetricians and other concerned physicians to planned home birth. We start with patient safety and show that planned home birth has unnecessary, preventable, irremediable increased risk of harm for pregnant, fetal, and neonatal patients. We document that the persistently high rates of emergency transport undermines patient safety and satisfaction, the raison d'etre of planned home birth, and that a comprehensive analysis undermines claims about the cost-effectiveness of planned home birth. We then argue that obstetricians and other concerned physicians should understand, identify, and correct the root causes of the recrudescence of planned home birth; respond to expressions of interest in planned home birth by women with evidence-based recommendations against it; refuse to participate in planned home birth; but still provide excellent and compassionate emergency obstetric care to women transported from planned home birth. We explain why obstetricians should not participate in or refer to randomized clinical trials of planned home vs planned hospital birth. We call on obstetricians, other concerned physicians, midwives and other obstetric providers, and their professional associations not to support planned home birth when there are safe and compassionate hospital-based alternatives and to advocate for a safe home-birth-like experience in the hospital. Mervi, Louise, do you think the RCM might want to make a response? All the best Soo