Print

Print


Juan,

Humidity variation is what vapour diffusion crystallization achieves.
In your list of all possible dehydration methods you would end up
classifying all
vapour diffusion experiments as a case of dehydration. After nucleation,
crystals
continue to grow and the drop continues to become more concentrated in
precipitant.
I agree you are completely right!

The concept of crystal hydration is very complicated:
Crystals are grown in liquid water and often analysed in vitrified water
with a solvent-hydrogen bond network that is different from that in the
liquid state.
What does this mean in terms of hydration?
The use of cryo-protectant alter the solvent hydrogen bonding pattern.
What does this mean in terms of hydration?
VM, the Matthews coefficient, defined as the crystal volume per unit of
protein molecular weight is a a measure of hydration?
So if the VM is the same the hydration is the same?

I agree that all the methods that you mention will affect hydration of the
crystals, but the way that X-ray crystallography is carried out today
cannot avoid it.

"Crystal dehydration" must be defined as an explicit effort to use
methodology designed to alter the hydration of crystals, preferably using
a defined measured and controlled relative humidity value. As  you start
to consider badly defined systems, you will also have badly defined
hydration.

Enrico.


On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:18:05 +0100, Juan Sanchez-Weatherby
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> From Leonid's reply earlier you can see a problem some of us have been
> having for a while now, when looking for literature regarding
> dehydration. Most of you that perform dehydration either don't consider
> it happening or don't report it in great detail in your publications.
> This is only understandable because it isn't the focus of your work and
> it only helps you get to where you want to get to.
>
> I'm trying to get an up to date picture of what is out there but I
> haven't got the time or eyes to go through everyone's methods to pick
> the couple of lines that describe your particular method. I really want
> to find out what is being done to be able to give people better advice.
>
> So: Could people out there that think that in their particular projects
> dehydration/hydration had an effect send me a ref. or a short
> description? (can be done outside the BB to not spam everyone) I will
> duly acknowledge everyone!!
>
> By dehydration I mean:
>
> 1 Soaking with increasing concentration of precipitants or salts
> 2 By equilibrating against a new precipitant or salt (by vapour
> diffusion or dialysis)
> 3 By letting the drops dry (controlled or uncontrolled)
> 4 by using an FMS/HC1/MicroRT or any other gadget
> 5 By some other magical trick you may have
>
> Thank you all for your help,
>
> Regards
>
> Juan
>
> ====================================
> Juan Sanchez-Weatherby, PhD
> Beamline Scientist - I02
> Macromolecular Crystallography Group
>  Diamond Light Source Ltd
> Diamond House DR1.64
> Harwell Science and Innovation Campus
> RAL, Chilton, Didcot
> Oxfordshire
> OX11 0DE
> United Kingdom
>  Tel: +44 (0)1235 778661
> Mob:+44 (0)7795 641259
> Fax:+44 (0)1235 778052
>  [log in to unmask]
>  http://www.diamond.ac.uk
> ====================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Leonid Sazanov
> Sent: 15 January 2013 19:32
> To: ccp4bb
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crystal dehydration
>
> In case if dehydration needs to be done slowly and under tight control
> of all parameters, one possibility is to use micro-dialysis  buttons.
>
> We used it for a large membrane protein complex and diffraction improved
> from ~7 to 2.7 A. The crystal is fished out and put into mother liquor
> solution in the button, sealed with dialysis membrane and the button is
> then placed into about 5 mls of mother liquor with slightly higher PEG
> concentration. Then you just exchange outside buffer every day or so for
> solutions containing higher concentrations of PEG. We went from ~9 to 30
> % PEG4000 in about a week. You can easily observe crystal under
> microscope and if it cracks - you went too far/too quickly with PEG and
> need to use a bit less next time. Also, this method allows you to
> control all other components of the dehydrating solution - we needed to
> decrease salt concentration at the same time as increasing PEG. You can
> also introduce/increase cryo-protectant concentration at the same time.
> With these crystals, otherwise excellent dehydration machines already
> mentioned did not work, possibly because the process had to be really
> slow. The reference is here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822288
>
> Best wishes.


--
Enrico A. Stura D.Phil. (Oxon) ,    Tel: 33 (0)1 69 08 4302 Office
Room 19, Bat.152,                   Tel: 33 (0)1 69 08 9449    Lab
LTMB, SIMOPRO, IBiTec-S, CE Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette,   FRANCE
http://www-dsv.cea.fr/en/ibitecs/simopro/ltmb/cristallogenese
http://www.chem.gla.ac.uk/protein/mirror/stura/index2.html
e-mail: [log in to unmask]                             Fax: 33 (0)1 69 08 90 71