Print

Print



I've never used STC in Feat, but yes I believe that is what you want.

cheers,
-MH

-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: [log in to unmask]

From: "David V. Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:17 PM
To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [FSL] interleaved slice-timing correction: odd vs. even slice number

Thanks Michael and Steve. OK, so I should make a slice order file that looks like this:

2
4
6
1
3
5

Just want to make sure I don't mess this up... It's a little confusing.

David



On Dec 14, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Stephen Smith wrote:

OK - in which case it's clear from the set of options that one of the "custom" options needs to be used  :-)
Steve.

On 14 Dec 2012, at 15:26, Michael Harms wrote:


Hi Steve,
Are you sure?  The issue is that if you collect an Interleaved acquisition with an even number of slices on a Siemen's scanner, then the slice acquired first in time is slice 2 (counting from 1),  which is not consistent with the "Interleaved" option in Feat.

cheers,
-MH

-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: [log in to unmask]

From: Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2012 1:41 AM
To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [FSL] interleaved slice-timing correction: odd vs. even slice number

Hi - no it should work fine for any number of slices.
Cheers.


On 14 Dec 2012, at 05:40, David V. Smith wrote:

Hi,

I realize FSL generally recommends using temporal derivatives instead of slice-timing correction, but I was wondering if the the slice-timing correction only works correctly for an odd number of slices? I saw this post from a few years back, but it looks like the option is the same:

JISCMail - fsl Archive - Slice timing correction with Siemens scanner (https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=fsl;6dc7322c.0703)

If I have an even number of slices (and Siemens data), do I need to make a slice order file that looks like this (let's imagine 6 slices):
2
4
6
1
3
5

Thanks,
David



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director,  Oxford University FMRIB Centre

FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford  OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726  (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask]    http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------------





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director,  Oxford University FMRIB Centre

FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford  OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726  (fax 222717)  2176
[log in to unmask]    http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------------




--------------------------------------------
David V. Smith, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow, Delgado Lab
Department of Psychology
Rutgers University
Newark, NJ 07102
--------------------------------------------