Hi Steve,
Are you sure? The issue is that if you collect an Interleaved acquisition with an even number of slices on a Siemen's scanner, then the slice acquired first in time is slice 2 (counting from 1), which is not consistent with the "Interleaved" option in Feat.
cheers,
-MH
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
From: Stephen Smith <
[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <
[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2012 1:41 AM
To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <
[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [FSL] interleaved slice-timing correction: odd vs. even slice number
Hi - no it should work fine for any number of slices.
Cheers.
On 14 Dec 2012, at 05:40, David V. Smith wrote:
Hi,
I realize FSL generally recommends using temporal derivatives instead of slice-timing correction, but I was wondering if the the slice-timing correction only works correctly for an odd number of slices? I saw this post from a few years back, but it looks like the option is the same:
JISCMail - fsl Archive - Slice timing correction with Siemens scanner (
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=fsl;6dc7322c.0703)
If I have an even number of slices (and Siemens data), do I need to make a slice order file that looks like this (let's imagine 6 slices):
2
4
6
1
3
5
Thanks,
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve---------------------------------------------------------------------------