 |
 |
She her L ----- Original Message ----- From: "Poetryetc: poetry and poetics" To: Cc: Sent:Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:22:57 -0000 Subject:Re: gay and 7 and IQ I phoned Him and he said he would look into it but he was a bit busy out smiting at the moment P smitten -----Original Message----- From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Upton Sent: 14 November 2012 12:27 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: gay and 7 and IQ Why would any decent person mention lesbians? There is no such thing as a lesbian. To say there are lesbians is a calumny upon the fairest of God's creatures. And if God were here now, he'd agree with me. Smite them, Lord. L ----- Original Message ----- From: "Poetryetc: poetry and poetics" To: Cc: Sent:Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:22:15 +0000 Subject:Re: gay and 7 and IQ Basically, the gays and the aspies are responsible for just about everything good in culture and technology But where are the women in this picture? The lesbians? (it's an interesting cultural shift: there was a time not so long ago when one of the predominant figurations of creativity was coded as virile and often exuberantly heterosexual. There were no women in that picture either...) Dominic On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Lawrence Upton wrote: > > > Doxalot? It's ages since a read the Arthurian legends > > > > L > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Poetryetc: poetry and poetics" > To: > Cc: > Sent:Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:29:53 -0000 > Subject:Re: gay and 7 and IQ > > A bit of what?? :-) p puzzled God does not exbut a helluva lot of > churches are spring p in Raynes Park even threatened with the doxa > lot!! > P puzzled and threatened and def of subject -better take the dog out > (new dog last one was 65 years ago!!) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > On Behalf Of Lawrence Upton > Sent: 14 November 2012 11:09 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: gay and 7 and IQ > > that was very sloppily said > > I am not equating defence of IQ with racism > > i'll just go and stand in the corner for a bit > > L > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Poetryetc: poetry and poetics" > To: > Cc: > Sent:Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:55:46 -0000 > Subject:Re: gay and 7 and IQ > > Perhaps god only exists up to 10points -But I have never met the guy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > On Behalf Of Lawrence Upton > Sent: 14 November 2012 10:43 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: gay and 7 and IQ > > I was listening to an exchange, I suppose you would call it, on a > specialist radio programme. One side said that the problem with I Q > testing is that if you repeat the test you get a different answer by > up to 10 pts which is worrying. It may be generally indicative; but it > is not precise > > I was debating or trying to debate the existence of God the other day > and the main pro God argument seemed to be that I did not understand > > ttfn > > L > > >It did occur to me that the IQ wouldn't be understood > > >It gets complex and involves relation of forces... a statistical > figure is not an identified number, but a force vector. So a specific > example cannot be given unlike the sort stuff that follows Aristotle > confused as neo-Platonist > > >There is a lot of myth around IQ testing saying it is all cultural, > but that is ignorant crap, of course. IQ is not a category and to say > so confuses index and category. > > On 07/11/12 03:38, Lawrence Upton wrote: > > That's about it, I think. > > -- Shall we be pure or impure? Today we shall be very pure. It must always be possible to contain impurities in a pure way. --Tarmo Uustalu and Varmo Vene