 |
 |
Elisabeth I use some of the parameters behind from their report look eg. At slides 16-19 in http://www.slideshare.net/Wowter/publishing-for-impact-elements-for-a-publication-strategy But the ranking is not a ranking in the sense that is it not ranked on impact but rather on publication output. Wouter Wouter Gerritsma Information Specialist – Bibliometrician Wageningen UR Library PO box 9100 6700 HA Wageningen The Netherlands ++31 3174 83052 [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> library.wur.nl<http://library.wur.nl/> @wowter<http://twitter.com/Wowter/> wowter.net<http://wowter.net/> http://tinyurl.com/7r67fmm [cid:image001.png@01CC7D56.EB9D8450] From: A bibliometrics discussion list for the Library and Research Community [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Gadd Sent: dinsdag 27 november 2012 17:19 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Scimago Institution Rankings Dear colleagues, I may be behind the times here, but I’ve only just discovered the Scimago Institution Rankings (see my blog post http://openise.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/if-elsevier-ruled-the-world/ ). Does anyone know if these are used in any serious fashion by any organisation? Best wishes Lizzie Elizabeth Gadd BA (Hons) MSc FHEA MCLIP Academic Services Manager Library Research Support Co-ordinator University Library Loughborough University Loughborough, Leics, LE11 2FA Tel: 01509 222342 Fax: 01509 223993 Blog: http://openise.wordpress.com Part-time hours: Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday am.