 |
 |
Yes, that's reasonable. On 02/11/2012 12:05, Nick Jackson wrote: > The only other one I can think of might be Open Data Commons Attribution, which seems to fit nicely between OGL and CC0. > > Nick Jackson > Lead Web Developer > CERD > University of Lincoln > [log in to unmask] > (+44) 01522 88 6570 > > On 2 Nov 2012, at 12:00, "Christopher Gutteridge" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> For aggregation purposes I am going to recommend people publish datasets as OGL or CC0. Is that sane? Should we have more/less/different? >> >> -- >> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248 >> >> Graphite PHP RDF Library v1.5 released! http://graphite.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ >> University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ >> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/ -- Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248 Graphite PHP RDF Library v1.5 released! http://graphite.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/