Thanks.
Generally, I agree that is a good idea. However, I am concerned about using a typical scheme because in my hi-res fmri study, the adjacent regions I am interested in are smaller than the typical smoothing kernel. Using even 4mm smoothing kernel on the whole image would mean that activation in region X is due to adjacent sub-region y...Further, without smoothing, the data is noisy.
Not sure ….I would apply the same procedure to the whole image…
Stefano Marenco, MD
NIMH/CBDB
10 Center Drive, Bldg 10 room 3C103
Bethesda MD 20892
Tel 301 435-8964
Fax 301 480-7795
Email: [log in to unmask]
From: Joshua Lee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 4:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [FSL] Anistropic Spatial Smoothing Kernels
Hey thanks!
Might I ask another question?
If one were to apply a standard spatial smoothing kernel to just subsections of a functional image through the use of masks (e.g. use a mask to Gaussiansmooth just one subfield of the hippocampus), would the resulting smoothed image be problematic for use in analyses?Joshua
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Afni should have something to that effect….
Stefano Marenco, MD
NIMH/CBDB
10 Center Drive, Bldg 10 room 3C103
Bethesda MD 20892
Tel 301 435-8964
Fax 301 480-7795
Email: [log in to unmask]
From: Joshua Lee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 4:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FSL] Anistropic Spatial Smoothing Kernels
Hi all,
I am interested in using an anistropic kernel to spatially smooth high-resolution functional data. For example I'd want a 8mm FWHM in the z direction, but only 2 mm in z and y directions. In the structure I am examining, this appears to be a good way of increasing SNR while retaining spatial localization of activations to anatomical structures.
Has anyone done something like this before, and if so might I profitably use fslmaths to do so?-
Josh