Print

Print


In Germany there's a distinction between two different types of bikes,
that determines wether they are treated as bicycles or electric motor aided bicycles.

The most popular category is that of the "Pedelec" pedal assist bikes.  The sub 250W motor only engages when pedalling,
and they are limited to 25km/h (ca. 15mph).  Some models have an "starting aid" function,
that allows the bike to be accellerated to 6km/h (ca.4mph) without pedalling.
 
These are subject to the same regulations as bicycles:
-mandatory cyclepath use
-generator lighting!
-no mandatory helmet use
-no additional registration/insurance/liscensing

Another category with up to 500W motor and 45kmh speed limit is treated as an "Elektromofa"
(Electric motorized bicycle).  
These fall into the motorized bicycle (Mofa) category that also includes combustion engine
vehicles with sub 50cm² motors limited to 25km/h.
They require helmet use, a vehicle specific liability insurance that comes with a liscence plate,
an operating permit if you don't have a driver's liscence, and are banned from most cycle paths.

All electric bikes exceeding these limitations are considered light motorcycles.

my source:

http://www.adfc.de/pedelecs/recht/rechtliches-fuer-pedelec-fahrer


I have mixed feelings about the popularity of electric bikes, as i suspect that they are currently replacing
human powered bikes rather than cars. 
On the other hand their popularity could show the need for better cycling infrastructure, e.g. better on
road facilities, instead of the current German approach of making sidewalk riding mandatory.
Finally my doctor claims they extend the life and improve the quality of life of some of his patients
who are no longer able to ride hp-bikes.

Tobit Linke, Dortmund, Germany











Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:14:01 -0700
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Electric bikes / vehicles on cycle tracks
To: [log in to unmask]

Regarding the case of Seville and its revolutionary bike-track network (130 km of well connected bike-lanes built in only 4 years have provoked an increase of urban cycling from <0.5% of modal share in 2006 to 9% in 2012), e-bikes are FORBIDDEN on bike-paths and bike lanes, along with skateboards, pedestrians, joggers and of course motorised vehicles. (Skates and wheelchairs are allowed). Anyway the appliance of these interdictions is more than flexible.

Best,
Pedro

--- On Mon, 10/22/12, Chris Peck <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Chris Peck <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Electric bikes / vehicles on cycle tracks
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Monday, October 22, 2012, 12:05 PM

David,

 

This too, is a coming storm in the UK.

 

There has been intense pressure from Segway to be allowed to use pavements and cycle tracks. Currently Segways aren’t permitted anywhere other than private land (it was on his own private land that the owner of Segway, Jimi Heselden, fell to his death into the River Wharfe a couple of years ago).

 

The Department for Transport conducted a consultation on this 2 years ago, but, like so many public consultations, nothing has subsequently emerged.

 

CTC’s views on this matter can be found here: http://www.ctc.org.uk/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=5388

 

In brief, electric bikes are permitted anywhere that human powered (+/-EPO, extra blood) bikes can go. Remember, though, that electric bikes in Europe are regulated to lower speeds and power outputs than in the US. Currently sales of e-bikes in the UK are very low, only around 30k units a year, with far lower market penetration than in the Netherlands or Germany.

 

Electric wheelchairs are regulated under a different system and are permitted to travel on any surface, but at different speeds (4 mph on footways, 8 mph anywhere else).

 

Our argument is that the public health benefits are the main justification for cycling and walking. If you remove the public health benefits by encouraging people (perhaps also those who would benefit the most from active travel) to use fully electrified vehicles, you would undermine the case for investing in better facilities.

 

Chris

 

Christopher Peck

Policy Coordinator

CTC, the national cycling charity  

Direct Line: 01483 238 313

Mobile: 07951 213 554

Twitter: @ctc_cyclists

 

 

 

From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Patton
Sent: 18 October 2012 15:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Sustrans & NCN

 

Are electrified vehicles (e-bikes and motorized wheelchairs and carts) allowed on the NCN and the dedicated cycle tracks of (mostly northern) Europe?

 

I see a coming storm here in the States ...

 

David Patton

Sent from my iPhone


On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:04 AM, "Sabelis, I.H.J." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear all, dear Peter,

 

Thanks for the question - after emotion, the following may be of help?

 

.... In the Netherlands we have the ambiguous reputation of being a cycle-friendly country

 

with nice infrastructure, well-trained car-drivers, and a multitude of instruments / conditions

 

facilitating cycling for all. This may be so vis-à-vis some other (European) countries, but

 

it does not automatically mean that we are a cyclists’ paradise. Increasingly, a multitude

 

of use/s, infrastructure and regulations show how we should abandon the idea of ‘cycling

 

culture’ as a singular notion. Indeed, cycles come in many forms, for different uses, and

 

by different users. At the same time, this quality invites further investigation of use, habits

 

and values concerning cycling. Has cycling increased over the last couple of decades? Has

 

infrastructure adapted to the different users? Have politicians developed policies serving

 

cycling as an instrument of sustainable mobility and transport?......

 

This is a section from an abstract for the VeloCity Conference in Vienna next year... cycling cultures is the main theme.... would love to have an exchange on your question. In sum: there is not ONE answer...

 

Best, 

IDA

 


Dr. Ida Sabelis - FSW - Organizational Sciences
De Boelelaan 1081 / Metropolitan - room N-318
1081 HV - Amsterdam.
+ 31 20 5987611

Gender, Work and Organization - Joint EIC
Time & Society : book review section (international books)


Van: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list [[log in to unmask]] namens Richard Mann [[log in to unmask]]
Verzonden: donderdag 18 oktober 2012 10:41
To: [log in to unmask]
Onderwerp: Re: Sustrans & NCN

My understanding is that cyclists are subject to offences of being inconsiderate, careless and dangerous, whereas pedestrians are only subject to the basic laws about assault and threatening behaviour, and they can wander as they please.

 

So basically it is behoven on the cyclists to behave. No it's not a _cycle_ network.

 

{It is possible to create a cycle network - you do it by making bike-only roads with separate pavements - but it's rarely done in the UK}

 

Richard

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Peter Cox <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi folks

 

A quick question on NCN and priorities of users, having just witnessed (and failed to pacify) yet another ‘incident’? (Tho’ I was not part of it).

 

Probably just my ignorance, but once in place is there anything to stop a local authority redesignating an off-road section of the NCN as a shared use path with pedestrian priority as our LA seems to have done? It does mean that cyclists are even more at risk on these than the roads , since dog owners now have impunity to say that a cyclist knocked off by their dog should have stopped, and all conflicts, accidents & incidents now implicitly become the fault of the cyclist.

 

If not, is it cynical to ask whether it is legitimate to call it a cycle network?

 

Peter

 

Peter Cox

Senior Lecturer

Department of Social Studies and Counselling

University of Chester

Parkgate Road, Chester

CH1 4BJ, United Kingdom

+44 (0)1244 512039

 

Recent publications

Peter Cox (2012) “A Denial of our Boasted Civilisation”: cyclists’ view on conflicts over road use in Britain, 1926-1935 Transfers, 2 (3) 4-30

Peter Cox (2012) Strategies Promoting Cycle Tourism in Belgium: Practices and Implications, Tourism Planning & Development, 9 (1) 25-39 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2012.658167

Peter Cox (2010) Moving People: Sustainable Transport Development (London: Zed Books/Cape Town: UCT Press; Banglore: Books for Change 2011) also as  In Bewegung: Ist nachhaltiger Personentransport möglich? (Darmstadt: WBG 2012)

 

 

 


________________________________________________________________________
CTC, the national cycling charity, inspires and helps people to cycle and keep cycling. To join or support us visit www.ctc.org.uk or phone 0844 736 8451.

Registered office: CTC National Office, Parklands, Railton Road, Guildford, GU2 9JX

Cyclists' Touring Club, a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no.25185. Registered as a charity in England and Wales no.1147607 and in Scotland no.SC042541.

CTC Charitable Trust, a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no.5125969. Registered as a charity in England and Wales no.1104324 and in Scotland no.SC038626.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by CTC. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk.
_________________________________________________________________________