Still trying to get my head round the difference between the recording of the creators v. giving them access points, if any.
Jackie Johnson
Metadata Coordinator
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
0121-414-2767
Please note I do not work Mondays
-----Original Message-----
From: Helen Doyle [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 25 October 2012 15:19
To: Jackie Johnson (Library Services); [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] FW: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 10 - discussion
It seems an odd thing to do, especially
a) given that RDA does away with the Rule of Three (ie. allowing/encouraging you to transcribe everyone and make access points for all of them)
b) I was under the impression that one of RDA's strengths would be dealing with things like webpages where multiple people contribute (or is this a mixed responsibility issue?). In a digital world it is not so commonly the case that *an* item has *one* (or two) distinct author(s) - things are much more fluid now.
HelenD.
Helen Doyle
Assistant Librarian
Royal Academy of Dance
36 Battersea Square
London
SW11 3RA
0207 326 8032
>>> "Jackie Johnson (Library Services)" <[log in to unmask]> 10/25/2012 3:10 pm >>>
Yes am surprised by this too. For people's edification I append LC-PCC PS edict on this:
LC practice for Core element when there is more than one creator: After satisfying the RDA core requirement, catalogers may provide additional authorized access points according to cataloger's judgment.
So looks as if that really is the RDA Core element, or that's how I read it.
Jackie Johnson
Metadata Coordinator
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
0121-414-2767
Please note I do not work Mondays
-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Doyle
Sent: 25 October 2012 15:02
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 10 - discussion
Record no. 10 was the first one I tackled, and I was really surprised by RDA 19.2's instruction "If there is more than one creator responsible for the work...[and]...if principal responsibility is not indicated, only the first-named creator is required".
Does this mean that if I choose, I'm *allowed* to not mention Sue Batley!?
cf. AACR2's 21.6C1 which gives specific instructions to make an added-entry in such cases.
(disclaimer: it would obviously be a most unhelpful cataloguer who went down this route, but the RDA wording seemed to suggest it)
HelenD.
Helen Doyle
Assistant Librarian
Royal Academy of Dance
36 Battersea Square
London
SW11 3RA
0207 326 8032
>>> Helen Williams <[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> 10/25/2012 2:50 pm >>>
Yes, I was just writing an email to say the same thing. I wouldn't think to add this in a MARC record, and like the way RDA allows for these kinds of links, though as we mentioned earlier today, I'm wondering about how far to go with this, and the time it would add to cataloguing a resource.
Helen
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lee, Deborah
Sent: 25 October 2012 14:50
To: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 10
Vanessa: I like your related work field ... It has made me think about this ...
Deborah Lee
Senior cataloguer
Book Library
Courtauld Institute of Art
Somerset House
Strand
London WC2R 0RN
Telephone: 020 7848 2905
Email: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Now on at The Courtauld Gallery:
Peter Lely: A Lyrical Vision
11 October 2012 - 13 January 2013
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Freedman, Vanessa
Sent: 25 October 2012 14:44
To: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 10
Here's record 10. I found this one fairly straightforward, but maybe I missed something...
Vanessa Freedman
Hebrew & Jewish Studies Librarian
UCL Library Services
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2598 (Internal ext. 32598)
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7679 7373
E-mail: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Website: www.ucl.ac.uk/library<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/library>
**Please remember the environment and only print this if necessary**
The Courtauld Institute of Art is a company limited by guarantee (registered in England and Wales, number 04464432) and an exempt charity. SCT Enterprises Limited is a limited company (registered in England and Wales, number 3137515). Their registered offices are at Somerset House, Strand, London WC2R 0RN. The sale of items related to The Courtauld Gallery and its collections is managed by SCT Enterprises Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Courtauld Institute of Art.
This e-mail, including any attachments, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorised dissemination or copying of this e-mail or its attachments and any reliance on or use or disclosure of any information contained in them is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us by return of e-mail [or by telephone +44 (0) 20 7848 1273] and then delete it from your system.
________________________________
This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by Mimecast.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
________________________________
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer