 |
 |
Safer to keep the number 3 as just part of the title. Even though the conference is a series, the conference publications might not always follow the same pattern in their titles and might therefore lack a consistent collective title. RDA makes clear that it is fine to leave an edition number as part of title, e.g. MGMT3, and this might be a similar case. Best wishes, Bernadette ******************* Bernadette O'Reilly Catalogue Support Librarian 01865 2-77134 Bodleian Libraries, Osney One Building Osney Mead Oxford OX2 0EW. ******************* -----Original Message----- From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Doyle Sent: 25 October 2012 11:19 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 7 I don't think it's a multipart work, because presumably there'll be (or the intention is that there'll be) further conferences - there's no defined end point. I think I decided that by transcribing the title and then having a series/numbering statement as well, I'd covered all bases. Hadn't thought to have a 246 as well though! HelenD. Helen Doyle Assistant Librarian Royal Academy of Dance 36 Battersea Square London SW11 3RA 0207 326 8032 >>> "C.J. Carty" <[log in to unmask]> 10/25/2012 10:59 am >>> Here is my record 7, with a couple of queries noted on it: one is to do with the conference name which is not authorised for use in RDA records at the moment (but think we can safely ignore that as this is just an exercise). The other is a question about what to do with the 3 in the title: is it part numbering, does it mean this is essentially a series or a multivol work? I've just gone for the easier option and considered it part of the title proper. -- Céline Carty English Cataloguing Cambridge University Library Cambridge CB3 9DR