 |
 |
Totally agree about both Zeuner and Charles Reed. To which can also be added anything by Reed's student and my teacher, Robert S. Hoffmann. His work and that of the brilliant Charles A. Repenning on the recent, subfossil, and fossil mammals of eastern Siberia, China, and Beringia are a great place for a start in understanding both animal and human migration to and from North America. Hoffmann was in addition one of the world's great zoogeographers. The complete references can easily be found by going to the Library of Congress catalog page and entering the author's name for search. -- Deb Bennett > And while we're reminiscing over the Golden Oldies, let's not forget > Zeuner, F.E. 1963. *A History of Domesticated Animals*. > > Subsequent research has shown Zeuner to have been wrong on some points of > detail, but in integrating the zooarch record, such as it was back then, > with artefacts, epigraphy, ethno evidence and more besides, he set an > important precedent. And his book has left a legacy - see Juliet > Clutton-Brock's latest *Animals as Domesticates, *which is similarly > integrative. > > I guess we will each have our particular nominees, works or individuals > that have caught our attention and inspired us at key points in our > careers. Personally, I would put in a word for Charles Reed, whose diverse > published research is always a pleasure to read (because he wrote so well) > and who still makes me think (because he was so good at synthesising > complexity with clarity). > > Terry > > > Terry O'Connor > Professor of Archaeological Science > Department of Archaeology, University of York > Biology S Block, Heslington, > York YO10 5DD > +44-1943-328619 > http://www.york.ac.uk/archaeology/staff/academic-staff/terry-oconnor/ > > And see the blog at > http://zooarchatyork.wordpress.com/author/zooarchatyork/ > > > > On 13 September 2012 09:30, Christian Küchelmann > <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> taking up Terry's note that Naomis initial question was to focus on >> publications that had impact beyond our subject I can first second >> Henriette that Norbert Benecke's book is percepted by lots of scientists >> and interested public far beyond archaeologists and zooarchaeologists >> (at >> least in the German speaking community). >> >> The 'Hunters or the Hunted?" will certainly stay a landmark (and an all >> time favourite of mine). >> >> Not much less important basics in my view are: >> Binford, Lewis Roberts (1981): Bones - Ancient Men and modern Myths, >> London >> >> Lyman, Roger Lee (1994): Vertebrate Taphonomy, Cambridge >> >> Shipman, Pat (1981): Life History of a Fossil – An Introduction to >> Taphonomy and Paleoecology, London >> >> and various papers by Anna Behrensmeyer like >> Behrensmeyer, Anna Kay & Hill, Andrew P. (1980): Fossils in the Making – >> Vertebrate Taphonomy and Paleoecology, Chicago >> >> and not to forget: >> Davis, Simon J. M. (1995): The Archaeology of Animals, London >> O'Connor, Terry (2000): the archaeology of animal bones, Stroud >> >> The more recent ones have most already mentioned by others except: >> O'Connor, Terry & Sykes, Naomi (2010): Extinctions and Invasions: A >> Social >> History of British Fauna, Oxford >> Which, I will be sure, will become a basic publication in zoology and >> ecology. >> >> Best >> >> Christian >> >> >> -- >> KNOCHENARBEIT >> >> Hans Christian Küchelmann >> Diplom-Biologe >> >> Konsul-Smidt-Straße 30, D-28217 Bremen, Germany >> tel: +49 - 421 - 61 99 177 >> fax: +49 - 421 - 37 83 540 >> mail: [log in to unmask] >> web: http://www.knochenarbeit.de >> web: http://www.knochenarbeit-shop.**de >> <http://www.knochenarbeit-shop.de> >> >> >> >> >> Am 12.09.2012 um 18:19 schrieb Terry O'Connor: >> >> >> Naomi's question was about published work that has had 'reach' beyond >>> zooarchaeology. I agree with Henriette that Benecke's Der Mensch und >>> seine >>> Haustiere was an outstanding example. And, if it's not too ancient to >>> qualify, what about Bob Brain's The Hunters or the Hunted?. >>> >>> Terry >>> >>> >>> Terry O'Connor >>> Professor of Archaeological Science >>> Department of Archaeology, University of York >>> Biology S Block, Heslington, >>> York YO10 5DD >>> +44-1943-328619 >>> http://www.york.ac.uk/**archaeology/staff/academic-**staff/terry-oconnor/<http://www.york.ac.uk/archaeology/staff/academic-staff/terry-oconnor/> >>> >>> And see the blog at http://zooarchatyork.**wordpress.com/author/** >>> zooarchatyork/ >>> <http://zooarchatyork.wordpress.com/author/zooarchatyork/> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12 September 2012 16:34, Henriette Kroll <[log in to unmask]> >>> wrote: >>> Dear Naomi, >>> >>> I do not know how familiar the anglophone community is with the two >>> standard works Norbert Benecke wrote: "Der Mensch und seine Haustiere" >>> and >>> "Archäozoologische Studien zur Entwicklung der Haustierhaltung in >>> Mitteleuropa und Südskandinavien von den Anfängen bis zum ausgehenden >>> Mittealter" (both 1994). They are, as well as Sandor Bökönyis "A >>> History of >>> domestic Mammals in Central and Eastern Europe", essential and very >>> very >>> useful, for non-archaeozoologists especially the first mentioned one, >>> as it >>> focusses strongly on the cultural history of >>> human-animal-relationships. >>> >>> Apart from that, I think that some ICAZ-books, especially those with >>> less >>> zoological topics like "Behaviour behind bones" take the right path. >>> >>> And I second the vote for Laszlo Bartosiewicz' paper: "There's >>> something >>> rotten in the state..." >>> >>> What I liked too is: Susan deFrance, Zooarchaeology in Complex >>> Societies: >>> Political Economy, Status and Ideology. J. Archaeol. Res. (2009) 17: >>> 105-168. >>> >>> All the best! >>> Henriette >>> >>> >>> Am 12.09.2012 um 15:16 schrieb Naomi Sykes: >>> >>> > Dear all, >>> > >>> > I'm contemplating our profession and I would like to canvass >>> opinion... >>> > >>> > What articles, paper etc spring to your mind as examples that show >>> zooarchaeologists to be at the forefront of mainstream archaeological >>> research, rather than acting as supporting 'specialists'? >>> > >>> > I suppose I'm asking for examples, from anywhere in the world and >>> relating to any period, of papers/articles that make you feel proud to >>> be a >>> zooarchaeologist. >>> > >>> > The only rule to my query is that you can not vote for yourself - it >>> goes without saying that we are, of course, all doing great things! >>> > >>> > I'll kick-off by suggesting Legge and Rowley-Conwy's (1988) Star Carr >>> Revisited. >>> > >>> > Any other suggestions? >>> > >>> > Thanks is advance, >>> > >>> > Naomi >>> > >>> > ---------------- >>> > Naomi Sykes >>> > Lecturer in Archaeology >>> > Department of Archaeology >>> > University of Nottingham >>> > NG7 2RD >>> > >>> > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee >>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >>> message >>> in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. >>> Please do >>> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or >>> in >>> any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this >>> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of >>> Nottingham. >>> > >>> > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an >>> attachment >>> > may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer >>> system: >>> > you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with >>> the >>> > University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK >>> legislation. >>> >>> >