Print

Print


In fact they are Trojan

 

David Evans

Historic Environment Record Officer

(Postal Address)

Strategic Planning Policy & Specialist Advice

Department of Environment and Community Services

PO Box 2081

The Council Offices, Castle Street

Thornbury

South Gloucestershire

BS35 9BP

Phone: 01454 863649

fax:       01454 864473

 

Visit our HER on Line at

http://maps.southglos.gov.uk/CommunityMap/


From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Webster
Sent: 26 September 2012 16:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

But then the earliest names in the Wessex king lists are British ...

 

Chris Webster
Historic Environment Record
Somerset County Council
Somerset Heritage Centre
Brunel Way
Taunton
TA2 6SF

01823 347434

Online HER: www.somerset.gov.uk/her

 

 


From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of THOMAS, Roger J C
Sent: 26 September 2012 15:23
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

Quite so, that thought had already crossed my mind. We Romano British need to stick together in the face of these invaders.

 

Roger J C Thomas

 

Assistant Designation Adviser (West)

 


From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marion Page
Sent: 26 September 2012 15:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

They’re all Anglo-Saxon usurpers…!

 

Marion

(Been in Wales 25 years but directly descended from Anglo-Saxon Yeoman farmers living in Pett, Sussex c.1605, before you all start shouting!)

 

 

-------------------

Marion Page MA

Historic Environment Record Manager

 

DYFED ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST LTD

The Shire Hall, Carmarthen Street, Llandeilo, Carmarthenshire, SA19 6AF

Tel: General Enquiries 01558 823131  Fax 01558 823133

The Trust is both a Limited Company (No. 1198990) and a Registered Charity No. 504616)

Any of the statements or comments made above should be regarded as personal and not necessarily those of Dyfed Archaeological Trust.This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the administrator on the following address: [log in to unmask]

 

Ebost  [log in to unmask]

Gwefan www.archaeolegdyfed.org.uk

 

YMDDIRIEDOLAETH ARCHAEOLEGOL DYFED CYF

Neuadd y Sir, Stryd Caerfyrddin, Llandeilo, Sir Gaerfyrddin SA19 6AF

Ymholiadau Cyffredinol 01558 823121  Facs 01558 823133

Cwmni cyfyngedig (No.1198990) ynghyd ag elusen gofrestredig (No.504616) yw'r Ymddiriedolaeth Dylai'r datganiadau neu'r sylwadau uchod gael eu trin fel rhai personol ac nid o reidrwydd fel datganiadau neu sylwadau gan Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Dyfed.

Mae'r e-bost hwn ac unrhyw ffeiliau a drosglwyddir gydag ef yn gyfrinachol ac at ddefnydd yr unigolyn neu'r corff y cyfeiriwyd hwy atynt yn unig. Os ydych wedi derbyn yr e-bost hwn drwy gamgymeriad, dylech hysbysu'r

gweinyddydd yn y cyfeiriad canlynol: [log in to unmask]

 

 

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete Boland (Historic_Env)
Sent: 26 September 2012 14:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

Don’t you mean Edwin of Northumbria!!

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gregory Chuter
Sent: 26 September 2012 14:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

Aella of Sussex was the first bretwalda !

 

Greg Chuter , MA MIFA
Assistant County Archaeologist
Environmental Advice Team
East Sussex County Council

01273 336177
07500123634


From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Wardle
Sent: 26 September 2012 14:51
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

But surely true monarchs would have to be descended from Penda.

 

Chris Wardle

City Archaeologist

Planning & Economic Development

A11, New Walk Centre

Leicester. LE1 6ZG

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrew Armstrong
Sent: 26 September 2012 14:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

If we’re going down this line I would point out that none of them are legitimate – since none are descended from the line of Alfred the Great and the house of the Cerdicingas.

Not to be pedantic… ;-)

 

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Evans
Sent: 26 September 2012 14:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

Chris

Richard was regent his bastardisation of Edward IV sons was overturned by Henry VII, hence Edward VI, it may depend if either of the sons of Edward IV survived Bosworth whether Richard was more than a regent. It would be nice to think that Harry Tudor got rid of both boys but Buckingham got rid of at least one earlier. In either case parliament ruled Richard a usurper so he never reigned. The same case applies to Queen Jane and King James III. I haven’t checked the dates so I am not sure about Charles III!

 

David Evans

Historic Environment Record Officer

(Postal Address)

Strategic Planning Policy & Specialist Advice

Department of Environment and Community Services

PO Box 2081

The Council Offices, Castle Street

Thornbury

South Gloucestershire

BS35 9BP

Phone: 01454 863649

fax:       01454 864473

 

Visit our HER on Line at

http://maps.southglos.gov.uk/CommunityMap/


From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Wardle
Sent: 26 September 2012 12:10
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

Hi David,

 

Without being drawn into discussions as to the legitimacy or otherwise of Richard’s claim to the Crown; whatever Henry Tudor might have done in order legitimize his own claim to the throne, Richard did rule as king between April 1483 and August 1485.

 

As to whether that was a ‘good thing’ or a ‘bad thing’ I leave to Sellar and Yeatman.

 

Chris

 

Chris Wardle

City Archaeologist

Planning & Economic Development

A11, New Walk Centre

Leicester. LE1 6ZG

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Evans
Sent: 26 September 2012 11:47
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

However as the Richard who was killed at Bosworth was attained by Henry VII therefore was never king, so a special category is not needed. The Tudors accepted Edward V (note Henry VIII son was Edward VI) as a legitimate monarch and his brother if he survived Edward’s death would have been Richard III.

 

David Evans

Historic Environment Record Officer

(Postal Address)

Strategic Planning Policy & Specialist Advice

Department of Environment and Community Services

PO Box 2081

The Council Offices, Castle Street

Thornbury

South Gloucestershire

BS35 9BP

Phone: 01454 863649

fax:       01454 864473

 

Visit our HER on Line at

http://maps.southglos.gov.uk/CommunityMap/


From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roderick Millard
Sent: 26 September 2012 11:22
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A slightly different burial

 

I would still record it as an “inhumation.” The burial is your actual Monument record, and King Dick(?) himself would be “Human Remains” in your finds database – which is where you can go to town in the free text. Link both to the Friary Church (assuming you have a separate entry for that already) and add further detail as it is confirmed (or not) by scientific tests.

Rod Millard

Historic Environment Record Officer

Planning and Transport Development

Bath and North East Somerset Council

PO Box 5006

Bath BA1 1JG

 

Tel: 01225 477653

Fax: 01225 477663

 

Email: [log in to unmask]

Web: www.bathnes.gov.uk/environmentandplanning/Archaeology

 

Office Hours: Monday to Friday, 10:00am - 2:00pm

 

Making Bath & North East Somerset an even better place to live, work and visit.

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Wardle
Sent: 26 September 2012 10:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: A slightly different burial

 

Hi Guys,

 

I know it’s not a Friday afternoon, but though I would canvass views on how I might record a burial site that might be that of a certain king slain at Bosworth.

 

Currently the only appropriate term would be ‘inhumation’. Save for the fact it was in the east end of a friary church and bears what may have been fatal wounds inflicted in battle the burial is quite plain. So should I coin a new term if the DNA tests proves him to be King Dick?

 

Chris

 

 

Chris Wardle

City Archaeologist

Planning & Economic Development

A11, New Walk Centre

Leicester. LE1 6ZG

 


**********************************************************************
The contents of this email message, and any attachments, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The message does not necessarily express the views of Bath & North East Somerset Council and should be considered personal unless there is a specific statement to the contrary.

If you have received this email in error you may not take any action based on it, nor should you copy or show this to anyone; please reply to it and highlight the error to the sender, then delete the message from your system.

The provision of links to Web sites which are not part of the Bath & North East Somerset Council domain are provided for convenient information sharing purposes. The Council is not responsible for the reliability of these links, or the information provided, and it is not intended to imply endorsement of the site.

Subscribe to Inform - the free weekly e-newsletter from Bath & North East Somerset Council
Click http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/inform3

Making Bath & North East Somerset an even better place to Live, Work and Visit.

**********************************************************************

_______________________________________________________________
 
South Gloucestershire Council - rated April 2009 under the Comprehensive Performance Assessment a maximum '4 star' council by the Audit Commission
_______________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it from South Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You should not forward it by any method to anyone else who does not have a justified 'need to know'.

 

If you have received this email in error please notify the South Gloucestershire Council postmaster at the address below

[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________
 
South Gloucestershire Council - rated April 2009 under the Comprehensive Performance Assessment a maximum '4 star' council by the Audit Commission
_______________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it from South Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You should not forward it by any method to anyone else who does not have a justified 'need to know'.

 

If you have received this email in error please notify the South Gloucestershire Council postmaster at the address below

[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________

================================================================
                                                    DISCLAIMER
This message is intended for the recipient only and may contain privileged information.
If you are not the addressee, or you have received it in error, you may not copy, disclose, print,
or deliver this message to anyone. Should this be the case, please delete this message, and inform
the sender of your action by reply e-mail.
Gloucester City Council does not guarantee the accuracy or reliability of information in this message,
and any views expressed are not necessarily the views of Gloucester City Council.
Gloucester City Council does not accept any responsibility for any disruption or loss to your data or
computer systems that may occur whilst using any program or document attached to this message.
You are advised not to send confidential or sensitive information by e-mail, as the security of the
site cannot be guaranteed.  

Email communications may be logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


This message is intended for the use of the addressee only and may
contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received it in
error please notify the sender and destroy it. You may not use it or copy
it to anyone else.

E-mail is not a secure communications medium. Please be aware of this
when replying. All communications sent to or from the County Council
may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with
relevant legislation.

Although East Sussex County Council has taken steps to ensure that this
e-mail and any attachments are virus free, we can take no responsibility
if a virus is actually present and you are advised to ensure that the
appropriate checks are made.

You can visit our website at http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk


This Email and any attachments contains confidential information and is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. If this Email has been misdirected, please notify the author as soon as possible. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on any of the information contained, and all copies must be deleted immediately. Whilst we take reasonable steps to try to identify any software viruses, any attachments to this e-mail may nevertheless contain viruses which our anti- virus software has failed to identify. You should therefore carry out your own anti-virus checks before opening any documents. Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council will not accept any liability for damage caused by computer viruses emanating from any attachment or other document supplied with this e-mail.

Please consider the environment - do you need to print this e-mail?


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.

Portico: your gateway to information on sites in the National Heritage Collection; have a look and tell us what you think.
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/archives-and-collections/portico/
This email, and any attachments is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain personal and / or sensitive material and should be handled according to the principles of the Data Protection Act 1998. If this email carries a protective marking of PROTECT or RESTRICTED in the header it should be handled according to HMG guidelines, if not protectively marked it can be regarded as UNCLASSIFIED.

If this Email has been misdirected, please notify the author immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on any of the information contained in it or attached, and all copies must be deleted immediately. 

Whilst we take reasonable steps to try to identify any software viruses, any attachments to this email may nevertheless contain viruses which our anti-virus software has failed to identify.  You should therefore carry out your own anti-virus checks before opening any documents.  Somerset County Council will not accept any liability for damage caused by computer viruses emanating from any attachment or other document supplied with this email.

All GCSx traffic may be subject to recording and / or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.

_______________________________________________________________
 
South Gloucestershire Council - rated April 2009 under the Comprehensive Performance Assessment a maximum '4 star' council by the Audit Commission
_______________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it from South Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You should not forward it by any method to anyone else who does not have a justified 'need to know'.

 

If you have received this email in error please notify the South Gloucestershire Council postmaster at the address below

[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________