Print

Print


Right, le plus ça change, le plus ça devient la même chose ...

On 26.09.12 15:48, Serhij Wakulenko <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> in my opinion, the term /linguistics /is too recent to cover the time 
> span which the HSS members try to cover in their research. /History of 
> the language sciences /would perhaps be a broader designation, but not 
> really much better than /history of linguistic ideas/.
>
> My feeling is that the current name is nice enough.
>
> Serhii Vakulenko
>
>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:02:07 +0100
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: The name of the Henry Sweet Society
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Dear HSS Member
> At a committee meeting earlier this year, the question was raised 
> about the name of the Society, especially in connection with the need 
> to attract new members.  The full name is The Henry Sweet Society for 
> the History of Linguistic Ideas, and has been used since the 
> foundation of the Society in 1984.
>
> The committee would like to gather the views and suggestions of the 
> membership about whether there is a case for either choosing a 
> different name, fine-tuning the present name, or leaving things as 
> they are.  The simplest way is for you to send me an email ( 
> [log in to unmask] ) and I will put your comment(s) to the 
> committee at its next meeting -- probably in November.
>
> Here are a few thoughts to start things off:
>
>     * Is the current name too long(winded)?
>     * Could it be giving the impression to 'outsiders' that the focus
>       is on Sweet to the apparent exclusion of other equally important
>       linguists?
>     * Is the expression 'linguistic ideas' an appropriate one to have
>       in the title?
>     * Is the mention of Sweet transparent for a younger generation of
>       linguists?
>     * Should the world-wide scope of the membership and their
>       interests be emphasized by choosing a name that reflects better
>       the interests of the membership?  Some people might say that the
>       word 'British' should appear in the title; others that there is
>       no need to mention the administrative base of the Society.  A
>       parallel is the re-titling of the journal in 2009 to simply
>       'Language & History'.
>
>
> I look forward to receiving any comments from you.
>
> With best wishes
>
> Mike MacMahon
>
> (President, Henry Sweet Society for the History of Linguistic Ideas
> University of Glasgow
> Scotland/UK)