 |
 |
11 is also fine with me. I'd prefer not to move the time again, so can we have a vote for 11 from the people who are happy with 10? Sam On 18 September 2012 10:26, Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I'd prefer 11 not to clash with the local atlas meeting? > > cheers > alessandra > > > On 17/09/2012 10:20, Sam Skipsey wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> In order to allow people to attend the EMI training session, and >> because Wahid is doing Terribly Important stuff this Wednesday, we're >> proposing to shift the Storage Group meeting this week to Friday >> morning. >> >> Is Friday 10am okay for everyone? >> >> Sam >> >> On 16 September 2012 20:37, Jens Jensen <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> This coming Wednesday, I will be away (again), this time speaking at a >>> biosomethingist conference in Brussels about data security (possibly) for >>> some industry folk - they wanted me to write my slides _in advance_, can you >>> believe it!? - but can the usual suspects (ie Brian, Sam, Wahid) please work >>> out the logistics for the weekly meeting again this week? >>> >>> I'll aim to send some input/stuff before the Wednesday meeting. >>> >>> Thanks >>> --jens >>> >>> -- >>> Scanned by iCritical. > > > > -- > Facts aren't facts if they come from the wrong people. (Paul Krugman) >