The Welsh one is much better:
-
SCL(W) is totally opposed to the
introduction/use of voluntary labour, in order to compensate for the reduction
or withdrawal of services caused by redundancies, non filling of vacant posts
or inadequate staffing of libraries
&
-
Volunteers should only be used
where they ‘add value’ to the library service. SCL(W) support their
use in supplementation but not substitution (i.e. not to replace library staff
or the core functions they perform)
Lionel Aldridge
Performance Manager, Libraries Arts & Heritage
0113 395 2350
From:
lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Frances Hendrix
Sent: 08 August 2012 17:24
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Nails and jacks: comment
on recent SCL policy: Don’t punish the messenger!
Thoroughly
depressing but not surprising. "nail", "coffin" and
"we are ok jack" comes to mind.
Has a profession ever so spectacularly undermined it's own existence? been so
complicit in its own demise?
"It doesn't matter if people take your job + do it for free, just make
sure you train them to do it before you close the door behind you on your way
to the dole queue eh? "
People at the top of their career pulling up the draw bridge for those coming
behind them and in so doing undermining the profession and the public library
service.
Evidence based practice is shockingly non-existent in this wholesale handover
to volunteers. I would like to see citations for the claims made in this policy
about volunteers.
"directly increases community engagement, adds value to the services
available to customers and contributes to libraries being positioned at the
heart of their local communities. Volunteers do become positive advocates for
the service and many young volunteers do progress into full time paid
employment within either the Library service itself or the wider local
authority"
The final sentence in the paragraph made me snort in particular. Progress into
paid employment? when there is none? Rather a slap in the face for the staff that
some of these senior library people have made unemployed and replaced with said
volunteers. Shockingly insensitive to even include this sentence.
. I would also like to see evidence of how a library run by reluctant
volunteers who have been trained for a few hours (as is Gloucestershire's
There is talk of volunteers being "under utilized". I suggest SCL
concern themselves more with the OVER reliance on volunteers in some
authorities and the impact this will have on our libraries. The "heart of
the community" is being set up for chronic heart disease.
SCL Publishes Policy on Volunteering in Libraries
The
Society of Chief Librarians has revised and republished its policy on
volunteering
http://www.goscl.com/scl-publishes-policy-on-volunteering-in-libraries/
--
Friends of
Gloucestershire Libraries.
Frances Hendrix
Martin
House Farm, Hilltop Lane, Whittle le Woods, Chorley, Lancs, PR6 7QR
Tel:
01257 274 833. Mobile: 0777 55 888 03
________________________________________________________________________
The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the
intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient,
please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please
delete this email (and any attachment) from your system.
The Council does not accept service of legal documents by e-mail.
________________________________________________________________________