I agree with Ewan, in that I thought that was the plan agreed at the ops meetings.
I'm not an expert on perfsonnar so do not know if running both tests would be a problem, but it was not the intension.
Cheers Pete
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Gronbech GridPP Project Manager Tel No. : 01865 273389
Fax No. : 01865 273418
Department of Particle Physics,
University of Oxford,
Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK E-mail : [log in to unmask]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ewan MacMahon
> Sent: 12 July 2012 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: perfSonar machine in Sheffield
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ian Collier
> > Sent: 12 July 2012 10:37
> >
> > You don't want bandwidth and latency tests running on/against the same
> > machine. (The bandwidth tests running are likely to make the latency
> > results meaningless.)
> >
>
> Indeed, I thought the plan was for the original six sites with
> a pair of boxes to run both, and the sites with just the one
> new machine (that was going to be a gridmon node) would now be
> set up as a PerfSonar bandwidth box, and those sites just wouldn't
> have latency measurements.
>
> In other words, I think Elena's current configuration is what I'd
> expect it to be.
>
> Ewan
