Hi all,<div><br></div><div>I was wondering if anyone ever heard of folks keeping counts (gender, rank, whatever) of those who did peer review. The crit list is oft discussing the labor feeding the peer review system and who profits from it but I was wondering about the breakdown of who is doing what. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div>JG<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Jen Gieseking<br>Ph.D. Candidate in Environmental Psychology, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York<br>Instructional Technology Fellow, Macaulay Honors College of the City University of New York <br>
<a href="mailto:[log in to unmask]" target="_blank"><a href="/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?LOGON=A3%3Dind1206%26L%3DCRIT-GEOG-FORUM%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D734783%26B%3D--e89a8ffbaec5c1fb3304c237ee36%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a><br><a href="http://www.jgieseking.org" target="_blank">www.jgieseking.org</a><div><a href="http://www.spatiallyinclined.org" target="_blank">www.spatiallyinclined.org</a></div>
<br>
</div>