Print

Print


Human leukotriene C4 synthase (PDB accession code: 2UUI) is another example, illustrating how an N-terminal polyhistidine-tag, in conjunction with metals, presumably facilitated crystallization. 

On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Brad Bennett wrote:

I think it was an N-terminal RGS-type His tag in 3O8Y (human lipoxygenase) that mediated crystal contacts with a symmetry related molecule. As I recall, this tag composed a B-strand that formed a nice interface with a "native" B-strand of the symmetry related molecule. Pretty cool...

-Brad

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
With Flp recombinase - DNA complexes, a C-terminal His tag triggered a different (but sadly not better) crystal form, and the His side chains packed against the bases at the end of a neighboring DNA duplex.

=====================================
Phoebe A. Rice
Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
The University of Chicago
phone 773 834 1723
http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123
http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp


---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:14:58 -0400
>From: CCP4 bulletin board <[log in to unmask]> (on behalf of "R. M. Garavito" <[log in to unmask]>)
>Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] The effect of His-tag location on crystallization
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>   Most of the comments you will get will be anecdotal
>   in that people will report the successful results
>   and do not take the time or effort to characterize
>   the less successful results.  This often occurs
>   because the tagged portion of the protein is most
>   often disordered, even in the best crystals.  Thus,
>   other than saying "tagging on this end works, but
>   tagging on that end doesn't," there is little more
>   you can say.  Each case will be different, and it is
>   almost impossible to arrive at any generalized
>   conclusion.
>   We prefer C-terminal tagged proteins for a number of
>   reasons, but if an N-terminally tagged protein
>   crystallizes well, so be it.  Of the dozens of N-
>   and C-tagged protein structures we have solved in my
>   lab and with collaborators, I have only seen one
>   case of an ordered His-tag:  the His residues had
>   coordinated Cd ions, which proved essential for
>   getting good crystals.  However, beyond that there
>   was not much more to say.
>   For your protein and the resulting crystals, an
>   N-terminally tagged protein crystallized well.
>    Whether you can draw any more conclusions from
>   these results depends on characterizing crystals of
>   both N- and C-tagged proteins.  Just assuming that
>   the C-tagged protein is trying to crystallize in the
>   same or related crystal form as the N-tagged protein
>   is an unwarranted assumption without experimental
>   evidence to back it up.  That is why most groups
>   just run with the winner.
>   Cheers,
>   Michael
>   ****************************************************************
>   R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D.
>   Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
>   603 Wilson Rd., Rm. 513
>   Michigan State University
>   East Lansing, MI 48824-1319
>   Office:  (517) 355-9724     Lab:  (517) 353-9125
>   FAX:  (517) 353-9334
>    Email:  [log in to unmask]
>   ****************************************************************
>   On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:06 PM, weliu wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     We crystallized a protein and found that crystal
>     quality greatly depended on the location of
>     His-tag. When a His-tag was added at the
>     C-terminus, only crystalline precipitate or
>     spherical quasi crystals were grown. However, when
>     the His-tag was moved to the N-terminus, single
>     crystals were grown under a number of conditions,
>     and the best one diffracted to 1.7 angstrom after
>     optimization. I was wondering if there were
>     published reports describing similar cases.
>
>     Thank you in advance
>
>     Wei Liu