On Luddites the 200th anniversary of the attack
on Rawfords Mill is on the 11th April – sledgehammers welcome.
Unlike Bob Jones I am not Luddite – a Rebecca perhaps
– but I do not have a smart phone or any other such device and
don’t intend to have one. I don’t need to tell people I am on the
train – I know that.
The original publicity for the workshop appeared to be a
debate about public engagement but that is not what we got. If I had seen the
programm earlier I almost certainly would not have gone. I am not convinced by
the argument that the silent majority will get a voice through social media
– this was certainly implied. The noisy certainly succeeded in the
workshop.
Everyone does not have a computer.
1 In the short term yes in the longer term hopefully no.
2 The fact that there are 30 million
UK users of Facebook and 26 million UK users of Twitter means that there are 30
million UK users of Facebook and 26 million UK users of Twitter nothing more;
nothing less. They might have a use but it is limited and the workshop did not
demonstrate any expanded use. As I said before Flicker will be of immense use
in compiling, for example local lists
3 If you are doing a Conservation Area assessment then
postal information (thank you GIS) and meetings with the people involved, even
(horror horror) cold calls, a blog might help, however most blogs are for
fanatics and self publicists.
4 Surely Know Your Place a traditional website (traditional
and website in the same sentence) where instead of emailing the site you can
add things to a map, Yes social media may have a place but then so does quantum
computing
I still feel the day could have been handled better
replacing the useless afternoon session.
In reply to your discussion point – perhaps
Incidentally why are we left with pieces of paper from the day?
Historic Environment Record Officer
(Postal Address)
Strategic Planning Policy & Specialist Advice
Department of Environment and Community Services
The Council Offices,
Thornbury
BS35 9BP
Phone: 01454 863649
fax: 01454 864473
I thought the workshop in
There was plenty of
references to the variety of tools at our disposal for public engagement from
tea and cake to facebook.
At no time will social media
replace the need for face to face discussions, nor was this proposed at the
event.
The point of the workshop was
to cover some other options that people might not have thought about and in
this regard some points were quite important I think given the economy,
localism etc.
1 If we want to continue in
our role as custodians of the historic environment and to contribute to the
creation of better quality places we need new approaches that help us truly
deliver more with less.
2 The fact that there are 30
million
3 Leaflets on doormats on my
street are only relevant to the residents of my street. However, if that
message is also published on social media the information or the approach has
the potential to generate wider interest. It doesn't mean it will happen, but
to ignore the potential would be a missed opportunity. I am more likely to read
and respond to a blog entry than a published case study.
4 If we as historic
environment professionals are to remain relevant we need to form new
partnerships and collaborations. Use of social media will enable this to
happen. Although Know Your Place is not truly social media, it is crowd sourced
HER data. Since launching the site last year our HER has not only reached a
wider audience, but we now have partnership projects with the Universities
(Bristol and UWE neither of which ever used to speak to me), I have given talks
to umpteen organisations such as our local Civic Society, we have had three
exhibitions and the website is mentioned by developers, planners and most
importantly local members. I would argue that the use of social media might
actually result in more face to face discussions.
One comment in my group at
the workshop was that just to get heritage on the table when it comes to
regeneration, policy or place making would be a result. Given the profile that
the
_______________________________________________________________
South
Gloucestershire Council - rated April 2009 under the Comprehensive Performance
Assessment a maximum '4 star' council by the Audit
Commission
_______________________________________________________________
This email and any files transmitted with it from South Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You should not forward it by any method to anyone else who does not have a justified 'need to know'.
If you have received this email in error please notify the South Gloucestershire Council postmaster at the address below
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________