I meant to explain that in my earlier message, but I guess I didn't.
On 4/4/2012 11:04 PM, Flanigan, Beverly wrote:I'm not surprised. But I still don't know what it means. What's the difference between "And then Trayvon come and said the man was still behind him" and "And then Trayvon said the man was still behind him"?I just checked with a friend here in southern/Appalachian Ohio, and she commonly said "went and did" as a kid (and again, maybe as an adult too; we tend to pretend we no longer do these things). Interestingly, she's driven bonkers by the construction "try and do it." As for tense, for my mother "come" was her standard past tense form, so there was no inconsistent mix of tenses in her use of the construction.
-- -Angus B. Grieve-Smith [log in to unmask]
The Variationist List - discussion of everything related to variationist sociolinguistics.
To send messages to the VAR-L list (subscribers only), write to:
[log in to unmask]To unsubscribe from the VAR-L list, click the following link:
http://jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=VAR-L&A=1
The Variationist List - discussion of everything related to variationist sociolinguistics.
To send messages to the VAR-L list (subscribers only), write to:
[log in to unmask]
To unsubscribe from the VAR-L list, click the following link:
http://jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=VAR-L&A=1