Hi Chris,
I think I gave my small points earlier in that thread.
Basically, though, fairly straightforward; after the initial slow start identifying the initial corruption issue, support has been responsive, rapid and effective.
Also, it helped with LHCb (despite their not actually telling people to use it until just now) as much as ATLAS.
Sam
On 27 March 2012 15:21, Christopher J. Walker
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I've volunteered to give a brief talk on CVMFS experience in the UK.
I'm in the process of updating the talk I gave at hepsysman in BHAM.
Steve Traylan wants info on:
On 26/03/12 17:18, Steve Traylen wrote:
>> > I guess the practical application/problems / scale/ difficulty ,
easyness to deploy.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Problems you anticipate,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I guess the message from the whole session is proposing that cvmfs is
good for other
>> >
So if anyone has anything useful to add, I need it ASAP - the talk is tomorrow morning.
Chris