 |
 |
Hi all, I have tried to download CONN on both Mac and Windows computers, but both give me an error message when I try to open it. The file appears to be corrupted. Has anyone had success installing and using CONN? I was not able to reach the makers of the program. Thank you, Adrienne On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:32 PM, soha saleh <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi: > > I believe CONN toolbox is useful for that ( > http://web.mit.edu/swg/software.htm) . Please update me if anybody has > any comments on that or has used it with resting state data. > > Best, > > Soha > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:09:52 -0300 > From: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [SPM] connectivity > To: [log in to unmask] > > > Hi, > > check this out : > https://sites.google.com/site/functionalconnectivitytoolbox/home > > I'm not sure where the inputs have to be the time courses of the ROIs or > it has tools to extract the time courses given coordinates or a mask (I've > never used it). If not, you will have to open your functional images > together with a co-registered atlas (e.g. AAL) and extract the time course > from each region (usually taken as the average of the time courses > belonging to the region). > > Once you're done with that you might also want the Brain Connectivity > Toolbox, which takes the F.C. matrices you generated as input. This is the > link: > https://sites.google.com/site/functionalconnectivitytoolbox/the-brain-connectivity-toolbox > > Bw, > > Enzo > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Hekmatyar <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hello SPMers**** > > Is there any program or gui to make correlation matrix for different > regions (ROIs) of brain from data acquired in average resting-state BOLD > time courses?**** > > Thanks**** > > Regards**** > > ** ** > > Shah**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On > Behalf Of *John Fredy > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:38 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [SPM] resting state in older patients**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for the reply**** > > ** ** > > My process consist of: slice time correction, realignment, corregister of > functional with structural, smooth, normalization and use of the PICA > algorithm in the MELODIC software. Using that process pipeline I obtain > good results in different subjects from different populations. **** > > ** ** > > The realign process don't show significant movement**** > > ** ** > > For this case I am processing a single subject,**** > > ** ** > > I will try use the seed method**** > > ** ** > > Thanks again to all for the reply**** > > ** ** > > John Ochoa**** > > Bioingeniería**** > > Universidad de Antioquia**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Enzo Tagliazucchi <[log in to unmask]> > wrote:**** > > Hi, > > which method are you using? from my experience the "canonial" RSNs may be > sometimes hard to identify if you use PICA. If you just want to check > whether a particular RSN is on the data or not then I'd suggest seed > correlation, which has stronger assumptions (ROI selection) but it is more > likely to give you a nicer map for the RSN under study > > Bw, > > Enzo**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:44 PM, John Fredy <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > **** > > Hello all, > > I have a set of data from patients with ages around the 65 years. The data > was adquired with the patients in resting following the same protocol that > gave good results in youger patients. In the older patients I can't see the > canonical networks, this could be for changes related with the age?, Exist > any aditional consideration when processing data from older patients? > > Thanks in advance > > John Ochoa > Bioingeniería > Universidad de Antioquia**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > > -- *Adrienne Hezghia* Neuroscience and Behavior, BA Columbia University