 |
 |
All fwiw, RDA has a role for Production company, but does not put it in its list of "creators"; it's in "other", which is equivalent to dct:contributor. MARC relators do not include Production company, and the role seems to be associated with individual persons (Producer), not corporate bodies. [I tried to create a github account to add this comment, but there was an unidentified "problem".] Cheers Gordon On 09 March 2012 at 16:40 Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I looked at github and didn't see where to make comments, so i'll do so > here and maybe someone can add it to github for me... > > re: schema:productionCompany rdfs:subPropertyOf dct:creator > > I would contact a film expert to determine if production companies are > seen as publishers/funders or as creators. > > kc > > On 3/9/12 7:15 AM, Thomas Baker wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > The process of finalizing a set of mappings from DCMI Metadata Terms to > > Schema.org has been stalled. I have been the bottleneck for this, inasmuch I > > strongly feel we should have a well-functioning issue tracking and publication > > workflow in place before taking final decisions on the mappings themselves. We > > decided in January to use the issue tracker of Git, but I haven't found the > > time to get my head around how this would work in practice. > > > > Specifically, we need a way to collect issues about individual mappings in a > > structured way without trying to do this on the dc-architecture list. After > > we decide on the mappings, we need a way to collect comments from the public > > in a structured way so that we can mark mappings for reconsideration in light > > of better understanding. > > > > Thanks to Jon, I have set up a Github account for DCMI [1], which Kai and Corey > > have graciously volunteered to help maintain. Thanks to Jon again, the draft > > mappings have been published in Git as well as on the wiki [2]. > > > > Corey has offered to lead the way on using Git for issue tracking by entering > > some into [1] and explaining how our use of the tracker will work. I have several > > issues of detail with the mappings, but here is one to get us started: > > > > Proposed: > > schema:about owl:equivalentProperty dct:subject > > Tom says: > > The relation should be subPropertyOf because the domain of schema:about is more restricted. > > > > I have posted a Doodle poll at [3] to find a time in early April for a call, > > by which time we hopefully will have been able to sort out the practicalities > > of issue tracking and publication on this list... > > > > Tom > > > > [1] https://github.com/dcmi > > [2] http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/Schema.org_Alignment/Mappings_Details > > [3] http://www.doodle.com/6qwfqtvcg6nk2ghr > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet