Massimo Sgaravatto wrote: > Hi > > IS this a gLite 3.2 node ? > > > <verbatim> > Package classads.x86_64 0:1.0.8-1.el5 set to be updated > </verbatim> > > From which repo is it trying to get this package ? > > FWIW: the (EPEL supplied) classads 1.0.8 provides libclassad.so.*1*()(64bit) the glite classads 1.0-2 provides libclassad.so.*0*()(64bit) the glite-ce-blahp 1.14.8 package can be found in the latest glite 3.2 CREAM-CE list, so I am suspecting that Rodney is trying to install a glite 3.2 CREAM CE. hence you cannot install/upgrade the glite supplied classads with the EPEL (EMI) supplies classads on a glite CREAM CE. Solution: remove all yum references to EPEL repo's and try again. cheers, JJK / Jan Just Keijser Nikhef Amsterdam > > On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Rodney Walker wrote: >> Hi, >> On the cream CE I do >> # yum update --exclude=c-ares >> and get >> --> Running transaction check >> --> Processing Dependency: libclassad.so.0()(64bit) for package: >> glite-lb-logger >> --> Processing Dependency: libclassad_ns.so.0()(64bit) for package: >> glite-ce-blahp >> ---> Package classads.x86_64 0:1.0.8-1.el5 set to be updated >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >> glite-ce-blahp-1.14.8-1.sl5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving >> problems >> --> Missing Dependency: libclassad_ns.so.0()(64bit) is needed by >> package glite-ce-blahp-1.14.8-1.sl5.x86_64 (installed) >> glite-lb-logger-2.0.8-1.sl5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving >> problems >> --> Missing Dependency: libclassad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package >> glite-lb-logger-2.0.8-1.sl5.x86_64 (installed) >> >> The lib would seem to be there >> >> # rpm -ql classads-1.0-2.sl5.x86_64 | grep libclassad.so.0 >> /opt/classads/lib64/libclassad.so.0 >> /opt/classads/lib64/libclassad.so.0.0.0 >> >> Cheers, >> Rod. >> >> >> -- >> Tel. +49 89 289 14152 > >