Print

Print
Dear Scot,
 thanks very much for cooperation and help.
 yes I am very much aware about debates on origin of petroleum,
BIOGENIC versus ABIOGENIC from decades. but my hypothesis is totally
different from both.according to biogenic theory people petroleum has
been formed from organic matter from surface of earth like past
animals and plants and that is why it is biogenic.
 according to abiogenic theory people petroleum has deep origin in
the earth so it has abiotic origin.
  but my hypothesis is totally different . I believe petroleum has
deep origin as well as biogenic also and no need to manipulate it with
abiotic origin.
  if i am success full to prove it with experiments at the end it is
very much related with PT.Infect forces responsible for motion of
plates.
Thanks again

 regs
 KARAN
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Krueger, Scot <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Karan,

The biogenic versus abiogenic origin of petroleum has been debated for
decades, but this is obviously not the proper forum for a discussion on
the origin of petroleum. A simple web search can find you many more
appropriate discussion groups for such a topic. A quick Google search of
"Origins of Petroleum Discussion Group" came up with many options, one
of which I will list here, as it is currently having a lively discussion
about evidence for an abiogenic origin for some petroleum deposits:

https://www.goldenplanetforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=128

Since the vast majority of the viewers of the Geotectonics blog are
unlikely to have an interest in such a discussion, I would suggest you
take your ideas to this site or one of the many others listed by Google.
I'm sure you will find a much more interested audience there.

Thanks.

Scot Krueger

-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of karan bansal
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Crude oil etc

Dear Members,
  can any one suggest me another portal group like this where i can
discuss regarding my theory . CRUDE OIL HAS BOTH DEEP AND BIOTIC ORIGIN
.

 THANKS
 REGS
 KARAN

On 2/7/12, karan bansal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ok,i will not waste your costly time.
>
> Regs
> Karan
> On Monday, February 6, 2012, Hermann Lebit <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>> Very much agree!
>>
>> Hermanm
>> From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> Subject: Re: Crude oil etc
>> From: John Whalley <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> CC:
>>
>>
>> People, we've had a day of precisely the sort of non-discussion I
>> hoped
> to avoid when I made my comment this morning. Please, lets not waste
> any more of our time with it.
>> John
>>
>> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>>
>>
>> Christie Rowe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> This discussion is starting to feel a little elitist.  I agree with
>> the
> previous comments about keeping the discussion rooted in evidence, but

> this discussion board should be a fine place to air unproven and
> unpublished ideas and hypotheses, regardless of whether the person
> promoting the idea is a proven researcher from a recognized lab.  The
> original comment did not include any evidence, only arguments.  Same
> could be said of the responses; in addition, some of those arguments
> seem inappropriately personal.  I suggest all future participants
> consider taking their comments off list on this one.
>>
>> Christie Rowe
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Simon Woodward
>> <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps if Karan is seeking acceptance of his ideas, he should follow

>> the
> accepted route of submitting a paper to a recognized journal for peer
> review and potentially, publication.
>>
>