Print

Print


Not a definitive answer, but an interesting study that needs to be repeated in UK for OUR linguistic minorities...
 

50. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22 Suppl 2:306-11.  

 

The impact of an enhanced interpreter service intervention on hospital costs and 

patient satisfaction.

 

Jacobs EA, Sadowski LS, Rathouz PJ.

 

Collaborative Research Unit, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1900

West Polk Street, 16th Floor, Chicago, IL, USA. [log in to unmask]

 

BACKGROUND: Many health care providers do not provide adequate language access

services for their patients who are limited English-speaking because they view

the costs of these services as prohibitive. However, little is known about the

costs they might bear because of unaddressed language barriers or the costs of

providing language access services.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how language barriers and the provision of enhanced

interpreter services impact the costs of a hospital stay.

DESIGN: Prospective intervention study.

SETTING: Public hospital inpatient medicine service.

PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred twenty-three adult inpatients: 124 Spanish-speakers

whose physicians had access to the enhanced interpreter intervention, 99

Spanish-speakers whose physicians only had access to usual interpreter services, 

and 100 English-speakers matched to Spanish-speaking participants on age, gender,

and admission firm.

MEASUREMENTS: Patient satisfaction, hospital length of stay, number of inpatient 

consultations and radiology tests conducted in the hospital, adherence with

follow-up appointments, use of emergency department (ED) services and

hospitalizations in the 3 months after discharge, and the costs associated with

provision of the intervention and any resulting change in health care

utilization.

RESULTS: The enhanced interpreter service intervention did not significantly

impact any of the measured outcomes or their associated costs. The cost of the

enhanced interpreter service was $234 per Spanish-speaking intervention patient

and represented 1.5% of the average hospital cost. Having a Spanish-speaking

attending physician significantly increased Spanish-speaking patient satisfaction

with physician, overall hospital experience, and reduced ED visits, thereby

reducing costs by $92 per Spanish-speaking patient over the study period.

CONCLUSION: The enhanced interpreter service intervention did not significantly

increase or decrease hospital costs. Physician-patient language concordance

reduced return ED visit and costs. Health care providers need to examine all the 

cost implications of different language access services before they deem them too

costly.

 

PMCID: PMC2078550

PMID: 17957416  [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 

 
Mark R D Johnson
Director, MSRC/CEEHD
De Montfort University
Hawthorn Building 00.20, The Gateway
Leicester LE1 9BH
 
Please don't phone - use e-mail!