Hi Jacqui, I can confirm that the Birmingham results are included in the SCONUL consortium notebook. Best, David On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Jacqui Dowd <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > Martha, Selina,**** > > Looking for the Birmingham results this morning on the LibQUAL web pages > it appears that it is not yet available.**** > > ** ** > > Can you please confirm that their results are included in the SCONUL > consortium results?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > Jacqui**** > > ** ** > > Jacqueline F. Dowd > Management Information Officer > University of Glasgow Library > Hillhead Street > Hillhead > Glasgow > G12 8QE **** > > Tel: +44(0)141 330 6753 > Fax: +44 (0)141 330 4952 > E-mail: [log in to unmask] **** > > The University of Glasgow is a registered charity in Scotland, charity > number SC004401**** > > > On 11 Jan 2012, at 15:22, "Killick, Selena" <[log in to unmask]> > wrote:**** > > Hi all,**** > > **** > > From the SCONUL Notebook 2011 I can see that overall the responses were > split roughly 50/50 between Lite & Long, but I cannot see how this drills > down at an institutional level (it could be that everyone adopted a 50/50 > split, or half of the libraries used Long where as the other half used > Lite). It’ll be interesting to hear what everyone decided to do. **** > > **** > > At Cranfield we adopted a 50/50 split between Lite and Long in 2010 on a > trial basis, following a successful trial we went 100% Lite in 2011.**** > > **** > > And in case you haven’t spotted it, the SCONUL consortium notebook 2011 is > now available within the Data Repository.**** > > **** > > **** > > Cheers,**** > > Selena**** > > *Selena Killick* > Library Quality Officer > Barrington Library > Cranfield Defence and Security > Cranfield University > Defence Academy of the United Kingdom > Shrivenham > WILTS SN6 8LA > Tel: +44 (0)1793 785561 > Email: [log in to unmask] > Web: http://diglib.shrivenham.cranfield.ac.uk/ **** > > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > only for the named addressee. If you are not the named addressee, please > accept our apology, notify the sender immediately and then delete the > email. We request that you do not disclose, use, copy or distribute any > information within it.**** > > Any opinions expressed are not necessarily the corporate view of Cranfield > University. This email is not intended to be contractually binding unless > specifically stated and the sender is an authorised University signatory.* > *** > > Whilst we have taken steps to ensure that this email and all attachments > are free from any virus, we advise that, in keeping with good computing > practice, the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.**** > > *From:* The UK LibQUAL+ Interest Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]>] > *On Behalf Of *Lisa Donnelly > *Sent:* 10 January 2012 15:12 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: LibQual Lite query**** > > **** > > Dear all,**** > > **** > > We have also used the traditional LIBQUAL+ survey on a biennial basis but > would be interested in hearing views on the LibQual Lite version. **** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > **** > > Lisa**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* The UK LibQUAL+ Interest Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]>] > *On Behalf Of *Michelle.Breen > *Sent:* 10 January 2012 13:17 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* LibQual Lite query**** > > **** > > Dear colleagues, **** > > **** > > We’re planning to administer the LibQUAL+ survey this spring. **** > > **** > > In the past we’ve used the traditional LibQUAL+ questions but this time we > are considering LibQual Lite. **** > > **** > > I would like to hear from those of you that have done LibQual Lite and > those among you who considered it but decided not to go with it, and > perhaps the reasons why you chose not to go with it. **** > > **** > > Your input would be very helpful. **** > > **** > > Michelle. **** > > **** > > **** > > *Michelle Breen***** > > *Librarian, Administration***** > > -----------------------------------**** > > Room GL1-019 > Glucksman Library, > University of Limerick **** > > 061-233625 > www.ul.ie/library **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > -- David Green Library Relations Coordinator, MLS Statistics & Assessment | Association of Research Libraries GoogleTalk: [log in to unmask] | Skype: david.green.arl