 |
 |
Still think Github makes sense, as we can use it to collaborate on documents as well. That said, I wasn't aware of Atlassian's Open Source License. Thanks for mentioning that, Mark! If DCMI thinks we might have the resources to set up & run JIRA, here's info on where we might start: http://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request -Corey On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Mark A. Matienzo <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > +1 for Github, but +1 for possibility of JIRA if under Atlassian's > free-for-open-source program. > > Mark > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Corey A Harper <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> I agree that Github seems like a great choice, particularly if DCMI is >> already planning to use it for managing schema.org alignments & >> perhaps other similar documentation. >> >> -Corey >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> I'd like to reiterate my github suggestion and also suggest maintaining >>> related documents there. Github is free, the issues tracking interface is >>> simple, effective, and nicely tied to documents hosted at github. Github >>> itself is an excellent centralized document repository for distributed >>> version control. >>> >>> https://github.com/blog/831-issues-2-0-the-next-generation >>> https://github.com/blog/699-making-github-more-open-git-backed-wikis >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> I check email just a couple of times daily; to reach me sooner, click here: >>> http://awayfind.com/jonphipps >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:39:08PM +0100, Antoine Isaac wrote: >>>> > That's quite many things, maybe some splitting would help. Btw wasn't >>>> > there talks about an issue tracker? >>>> >>>> I agree. This is getting urgent. Can anyone out there help? >>>> >>>> There is a nice wiki page about issue tracking at W3C [1]. Tracker is >>>> great, >>>> but it is only available for use by W3C working groups [2]. The classic >>>> Bugzilla is mentioned but characterized as "kind of a double-edged sword >>>> in >>>> that it provides very powerful tracking and query features for those who >>>> are >>>> willing to take the time to understand how it works, but it can be a bit >>>> overwhelming and confusing for those who have not had opportunity to work >>>> with >>>> bug/issue tracking systems before or are not willing to take the time to >>>> read >>>> the documentation and understand how to use it" [3]. >>>> >>>> Also mentioned in [1] is RoundUp [4] -- a ten-year-old Python project, >>>> used to >>>> track Python and IETF projects, which I hear is easy to install and easier >>>> to >>>> use than Bugzilla. >>>> >>>> I see in my notes that someone once suggested Assembla [5] -- a >>>> cloud-based >>>> service to which DCMI would need to subscribe. >>>> >>>> If anyone here can testify to the usability (and easy-installability) of >>>> RoundUp, I'd be inclined to go with a system that is included with the >>>> rest of >>>> the DCMI Web archive. >>>> >>>> Suggestions, please! >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TrackingIssues >>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/ >>>> [3] http://www.bugzilla.org/ >>>> [4] http://roundup.sourceforge.net/ >>>> [5] http://www.assembla.com/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tom Baker <[log in to unmask]> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Corey A Harper >> Metadata Services Librarian >> New York University Libraries >> 20 Cooper Square, 3rd Floor >> New York, NY 10003-7112 >> 212.998.2479 >> [log in to unmask] -- Corey A Harper Metadata Services Librarian New York University Libraries 20 Cooper Square, 3rd Floor New York, NY 10003-7112 212.998.2479 [log in to unmask]