 |
 |
Dear all, I don't think Prof Friedman missed the points. Quite conversely, I think he has always been able to include most of the points, if not all the points in an email/s. The only thing I think is that 's been bugging me is his writing style which has usually been the *detailed thesis style* with all the minute details in. It's good on the learning front but I think its still good if the entire process could be much quicker and far succint. I don't know how others think, but it can sometimes make you either 'cry' or astonished by the amount of content that is pushed in on an online forum. I think a different line of approaches would be good. 'cos every problem, being et cetra is unique on its own. No one (type) fits all. Cheerio, Karen Fu playing on ideas on her iPad and a list of other fun little tools. On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Rosan Chow <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear All, > > > Ken Friedman has written a post in way that is quite typical of him, I > suppose. I have time on my hands and would like to learn from him. So I did > an analysis of his post (in inserted comments): Here is my conclusion on > how to write the Friedman's way: > <snip>