Hi Aydin,

Yeah, sounds like these definitions seem reasonable. They are definitely two different things. I'd say Tectonics studies a process, structural geology describes a phenomenon. It's impossible to study Tectonics without Structural Geology, but it's equally impossible to fully characterize Tectonic processes by only studying the structural aspect of it (without, e.g. geochronology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, paleomagnetism, seismology, etc).

Microtectonics would simply study the processes at a small scale, not just structure, but also rheology, fluid-rock chemical interaction, etc etc.

Kind of the similar to the difference between micropaleontology and paleoclimate: you need the former to study the latter, but micropaleontology won't give you a full representation of paleoclimate evolution.

Cheers
Douwe

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:37 AM, aydin CICEK <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Dear Ladies and Gentilmen,

What is the difference between Structural Geology and Tectonics?

If you say scaling is the main criteria to differentiate them. Then, what is a microtectonics?

I found some definitions:

Tectonics: Geodynamic processes such as subduction, continental collision, extension, lithospheric delamination... etc.
Structural Geology: Any geological feature having a definable geometry.

Are they ok or not?

I realized that the majority of my collugues confuse them. They use the terms as the same except scaling.

Full definitions will be great by giving references. 

kind regards,



--
http://www.geologist.nl
Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen, PhD

Physics of Geological Processes (PGP)
University of Oslo
Sem Sælands vei 24
NO-0316 Oslo
Norway
Tel: +47 22856487
[log in to unmask]