Print

Print


I was talking about books that meet usual bookstore criteria for quality. 

Yup, I think it's usually a bad thing. Publication rather than maturity of craft become the goals, superstardom at twenty in their imaginations, at any rate. So it becomes a matter of ambition. But I'm an old fart.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
>From: mIEKAL aND <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Nov 4, 2011 12:06 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Reading fees
>
>You say that like it's a bad thing.
>
>Cheap, easy to do it yourself printing started in the late 70s / early
>80s with copiers, not with POD.  Or I spose some would argue with
>mimeo, tho I could never get the damned mimeo machine to do what I
>wanted.
>
>~mIEKAL
>
>
>
>On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>It's not unusual to meet poets in their twenties, famous among their
>friends, with four or five books or chapbooks out.