Print

Print


 

 

________________________________

From: Equity, Health & Human Development
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ruggiero, Mrs. Ana Lucia
(WDC)
Subject: [EQ] Setting priorities in health

 

Setting priorities in health

A study of English primary care trusts

Research report: Suzanne Robinson, Helen Dickinson, Iestyn Williams, Tim
Freeman, Benedict Rumbold and Katie Spence

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham and the
Nuffield Trust

September 2011

Available online PDF [84p] at: http://bit.ly/nJstO4
<http://bit.ly/nJstO4> 

The research reported in this document was designed to map the
priority-setting activities taking place across the National Health
Service (NHS) in England, and to explore and assess the effectiveness of
these practices within specific local contexts.

The questions that provided the basis for the research were as follows:

* What priority-setting tools, processes and activities are practised
currently as part of the commissioning processes of English primary care
trusts (PCTs)?

* What barriers are experienced by PCTs seeking to implement explicit
priority setting, and how are these being addressed?

* What other strengths and weaknesses can be identified in current
priority-setting practice?

* What learning can be derived that will be instructive for future
priority setting within the NHS and elsewhere?

Content:

Key messages from the research 

1. Background and context 

Understanding priority setting 

Priority setting and commissioning 

The challenges facing priority-setters 

Research on local priority setting in England 

Research scope and aims 

2. Methodology 

Stage 1: National survey 

Stage 2: In-depth case studies 

Data collection 

Data analysis and reporting 

Setting priorities in health: a study of English primary care trusts

3. Priority setting: the national picture 

Developments in local priority-setting processes 

Remit and scope of priority-setting arrangements 

Stakeholder involvement in decision making 

Use of evidence and decision tools 

Use of decision tools in priority setting 

Strengths and weaknesses of priority-setting processes 

Disinvestment decisions 

4. In-depth exploration of priority setting 

Rationale for forming priority-setting processes 

Key features of the case study priority-setting processes 

Formal decision criteria 

Decision processes 

Role of discussion and deliberation 

Technocratic approaches to aid priority setting: the evidence-based
approach 

Stakeholder involvement in priority setting 

Engagement and involvement of health and social care organisations 

Engagement and involvement of the public and patients 

Implementation 

Leadership 

Overall coherence and 'success' of priority-setting processes 

Response to the White Paper: the impact of government reforms on
priority setting 

5. Discussion 

Decision tools 

Outcomes of priority-setting work 

Non-technical dimensions of priority setting 

Engaging stakeholders and the public 

Political dimensions of priority setting 

Leadership 

Information resources and expertise 

Impact of government reforms on priority setting 

6. Conclusions and recommendations 

Key policy drivers 

Governance 

Technical challenges 

System-wide approach to priority-setting 

Political realities 

 

Recommendations 

 

References 

Appendix: Different types of priority-setting activity to be considered 

 

Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho <http://twitter.com/eqpaho>  


 *      *     * 
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is
part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic
inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics;
Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.
[DD/ KMC Area] 
Washington DC USA

"Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless
expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors
and not necessarily of The Pan American 
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members".
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
PAHO/WHO Website <http://new.paho.org/equity/> 
Equity List - Archives - Join/remove:
http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
<http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html> 
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho <http://twitter.com/eqpaho> 

 





IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission. 

Thank you.


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer