Print

Print


Though I’m unfamiliar with the context of the Dylan Thomas quote it seems 
quite overarching – with “circumstantial” as well as “physical” being 
stressed. It might not so much suggest an actual disability as evoke a 
Romantic view of the poet being out of kilter in relation to society – a 
misfit. An image that has an old genealogy: you can find an equivalent in 
Baudelaire’s ‘L’Albatros’ – “comme il est gauche et veule”. There 
‘abnormality’  and weakness on the earth (or the deck) is integral to 
majestic flight, and the last stanza makes explicit the parallel with the 
poet.
   There are images of disability in poets being compensatory that stretch 
back to “blind Homer”.  The question is whether the reader wants to 
foreground the disability. In the case of Milton where the poet addresses 
the disability directly it obliges the reader also to do so. When Milton 
speaks of “light deny’d” in ‘On His Blindness’ he comes to view it as God’s 
“milde yoak” or in P.L, Book 3 when he refers to his blindness “....So thick 
a drop serene hath quencht thir Orbs” he then asserts the health of his 
imagination ‘No less...”
    If Pope’s Pott’s disease or Byron’s club foot are not often used as ways 
of reading their work, critics have tried to do this with Leopardi’s 
scoliosis and other ailments. The extremity of Leopardi’s attack on the 
world may well have been exacerbated by his condition, but the validity of 
the poems depends on the reader ignoring it, or considering it insufficient 
cause. (This thought needs a lot more refining.)
  A question that's raised by Ron Silliman’s review is how inclusive the 
definition of disability should be. If I’ve understood his argument, he 
would like it far more so than in the anthology which he praises. But then 
it would start not only to include him but almost everyone, there being few 
poets or humans in perfect health. Does Dylan Thomas’s alcoholism qualify, 
or Berryman’s or Hart Crane’s or even Bishop’s binge drinking or, more 
easily argued, Robert Lowell’s severe bipolar condition. As another recently 
mentioned example Zanzotto’s health was severely compromised from childhood 
by asthma and allergies.
    I haven’t read the anthology, but reading the review I began to wonder 
exactly what purpose it was serving. No poet would want their disability to 
be a kind of special pleading on behalf of their work though of course if 
the work could serve to challenge societal prejudices who'd object?
Jamie

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louise Bancroft" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: “A born writer is born scrofulous; his career is an accident 
dictated by physical or circumstantial disabilities.” Dylan Thomas


Interesting quesion David, why do you ask?

(The answer is yes by the way...)

I recently (and for the first time) read out a draft poem to my MA group 
about my disability and was intrigued by the various reactions. Hence my 
wish to explore this area further, possibly for my dissertation.

Many thanks for the other 'pointers' you posted.

Kind regards

Louise