Thanks!
However using the current version, which space should the targets volume masks in?
Since there is only one --xfm (freesurfer2fa.mat) already for the surface seed, I am really confused about the probelm.
 
 
2011-09-23
Xiangzhen
 
发件人： Saad Jbabdi
发送时间： 2011-09-23  16:46:10
收件人： FSL
抄送：
主题： Re: [FSL] probtrackx from freesurfer cortical surfaces
Hi
In probtrackx's current (released) form, only the seed mask can be a surface/label, the targets should be volume masks.
In the next release, all masks in probtrackx can be either volumes, surfaces or combinations of these.

Cheers,
Saad.


On 23 Sep 2011, at 03:01, bnucon wrote:

According the content in the webpage http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fdt/fdt_surface.html, we can run probtrackx from surface.
Should the target masks are labels from freesurfer when using classification targets in probtrackx? Or just masks in volume?
 
 
2011-09-23
Xiangzhen 

--
Saad Jbabdi
University of Oxford, FMRIB Centre

JR Hospital, Headington, OX3 9DU, UK
(+44)1865-222466  (fax 717)